ReviewClinical rheumatology2014
The effect of lateral wedge insoles in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: balancing biomechanics with pain neuroscience.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Lateral Wedge Insole With and Without Thigh and Abdominal Muscle Strengthening Exercises on the Balance of Young People With Genuvarum: A Randomize Controlled Trial.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Finding the Goldilocks Zone of Mechanical Loading: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanical Loading in the Prevention and Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Results on the effects of lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) are ambiguous and not fully understood. Because of the low cost of this intervention and its clinical utility, attention to LWIs is worth considering. Current insights on the efficacy of LWIs are mainly focused on changing biomechanical aspects, such as the external knee adduction moment, in an attempt to influence pain, functional ability and structural progression. It is however appropriate to interpret the effectiveness of LWIs in a broader concept than the pure biomechanical approach. Given our current understanding of OA-related pain, including the involvement of the central nervous system and nociception-motor interactions, concepts of pain neuroscience should be taken into account. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the biomechanical effect of LWIs. It aims to discuss the degree to which such biomechanical effect translates to clinical effects (symptom relief, function recovery and reduction of structural progression). In order to explain these clinical effects, this paper balances biomechanics with pain neuroscience. A literature search was performed and reviewed using a narrative approach. Many studies investigated the effect of LWIs on dynamic knee joint loading, and beneficial biomechanical effects (reduction in knee adduction moment) were observed in patients with mild to moderate medial knee OA, in particular when using full-length LWIs. However, despite beneficial biomechanical effects, there is insufficient evidence for clinically important effects or significant reductions in disease progression. Evaluating the effects of LWIs, our current understanding of OA pain should be taken into account, as LWIs may be part of a comprehensive biopsychosocial treatment. Future work on all of the variables that could influence clinical outcomes in order to decide in which subgroups of patients LWIs are (most) effective is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.