Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24936198›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2014

Mesenchymal stem cell-based treatment for microvascular and secondary complications of diabetes mellitus.

Grace C Davey, Swapnil B Patil, Aonghus O'Loughlin, Timothy O'Brien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Angiogenin Released from ABCB5The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Stem cell transplantation therapy for diabetic foot ulcer: a narrative review.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace C DaveyRegenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI) and Biosciences Building, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland.
Swapnil B PatilRegenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI) and Biosciences Building, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland.
Aonghus O'LoughlinDepartment of Medicine, Galway University Hospital (GUH) , Galway , Ireland.
Timothy O'BrienRegenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI) and Biosciences Building, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland ; Department of Medicine, Galway University Hospital (GUH) , Galway , Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide increase in the prevalence of Diabetes mellitus (DM) has highlighted the need for increased research efforts into treatment options for both the disease itself and its associated complications. In recent years, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been highlighted as a new emerging regenerative therapy due to their multipotency but also due to their paracrine secretion of angiogenic factors, cytokines, and immunomodulatory substances. This review focuses on the potential use of MSCs as a regenerative medicine in microvascular and secondary complications of DM and will discuss the challenges and future prospects of MSCs as a regenerative therapy in this field. MSCs are believed to have an important role in tissue repair. Evidence in recent years has demonstrated that MSCs have potent immunomodulatory functions resulting in active suppression of various components of the host immune response. MSCs may also have glucose lowering properties providing another attractive and unique feature of this therapeutic approach. Through a combination of the above characteristics, MSCs have been shown to exert beneficial effects in pre-clinical models of diabetic complications prompting initial clinical studies in diabetic wound healing and nephropathy. Challenges that remain in the clinical translation of MSC therapy include issues of MSC heterogeneity, optimal mode of cell delivery, homing of these cells to tissues of interest with high efficiency, clinically meaningful engraftment, and challenges with cell manufacture. An issue of added importance is whether an autologous or allogeneic approach will be used. In summary, MSC administration has significant potential in the treatment of diabetic microvascular and secondary complications but challenges remain in terms of engraftment, persistence, tissue targeting, and cell manufacture.

Indexed as

diabetesmesenchymal stromal cellmicrovascular complicationMSCnephropathyneuropathyretinopathy

Identifiers

PMID24936198
PMCPMC4047679

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.