Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24947951›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2014

Changes in the degree of mineralization with osteoporosis and its treatment.

Paul Roschger, Barbara Misof, Eleftherios Paschalis, Peter Fratzl, Klaus Klaushofer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul Roschger1st Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology at the Hanusch Hospital of WGKK and AUVA Trauma Centre Meidling, Heinrich Collin Str. 30, A-1140, Vienna, Austria, paul.roschger@osteologie.at.
Barbara Misof
Eleftherios Paschalis
Peter Fratzl
Klaus Klaushofer
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology · ATHanusch Hospital · ATMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on low bone mineral density (BMD) and/or the occurrence of fragility fractures. The majority of patients, however, have also abnormally low bone matrix mineralization. The latter is indicative of alterations in bone turnover rates and/or in kinetics of mineral accumulation within the newly formed bone matrix. Osteoporosis therapies can alter the bone matrix mineralization according to their action on bone turnover and/or mineralization kinetics. Antiresorptives, including the most widely used bisphosphonates, reduce the bone turnover rate resulting in a decrease in heterogeneity and an increase in the degree of mineralization toward to or even beyond normal values. Anabolic agents increase the bone volume and the amount of newly formed bone resulting in a likely transient decrease in mean degree and homogeneity of mineralization. Hence, the measurement of bone matrix mineralization is a sensitive tool to evaluate the response to therapy.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcification, PhysiologicDiphosphonatesHumansOsteoporosisTeriparatideAnabolic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID24947951
OpenAlexW2047771304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.