Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952576›Full record

Trial reportLipids in health and disease2014

A randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy of manufacturers' recommended doses of omega-3 fatty acids from different sources in facilitating cardiovascular disease risk reduction.

Maggie Laidlaw, Carla A Cockerline, William J Rowe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lipids in health and disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01960660 (A Marketing-oriented Study to Evaluate the Comparative Bioavailability of Omega-3 Fatty Acids From Four Different Natural Health Products), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01960660 nacompletednot on this map

A Marketing-oriented Study to Evaluate the Comparative Bioavailability of Omega-3 Fatty Acids From Four Different Natural Health Products

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordic Pharma, USARan2012 to 2013Enrolled35ConditionsComparative BioavailabilityArmsOmega-3 Fatty Acids
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nutrigenomics of Dietary Lipids.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maggie LaidlawNutrasource Diagnostic Inc,, 120 Research Lane, University of Guelph Research Park, Suite 203, Guelph N1G0B4, Ontario, Canada. mlaidlaw@nutrasource.ca.
Carla A Cockerline
William J Rowe
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmega-3 fatty acids confer beneficial health effects, but North Americans are lacking in their dietary omega-3-rich intake. Supplementation is an alternative to consumption of fish; however, not all omega-3 products are created equal. The trial objective was to compare the increases in blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids after consumption of four different omega-3 supplements, and to assess potential changes in cardiovascular disease risk following supplementation.

methodsThis was an open-label, randomized, cross-over study involving thirty-five healthy subjects. Supplements and daily doses (as recommended on product labels) were:Concentrated Triglyceride (rTG) fish oil: EPA of 650 mg, DHA of 450 mgEthyl Ester (EE) fish oil: EPA of 756 mg, DHA of 228 mgPhospholipid (PL) krill oil: EPA of 150 mg, DHA of 90 mgTriglyceride (TG) salmon oil: EPA of 180 mg, DHA of 220 mg.Subjects were randomly assigned to consume one of four products, in random order, for a 28-day period, followed by a 4-week washout period. Subsequent testing of the remaining three products, followed by 4-week washout periods, continued until each subject had consumed each of the products. Blood samples before and after supplementation were quantified for fatty acid analysis using gas chromatography, and statistically analysed using ANOVA for repeated measures.

resultsAt the prescribed dosage, the statistical ranking of the four products in terms of increase in whole blood omega-3 fatty acid levels was concentrated rTG fish oil > EE fish oil > triglyceride TG salmon oil > PL krill oil. Whole blood EPA percentage increase in subjects consuming concentrated rTG fish oil was more than four times that of krill and salmon oil. Risk reduction in several elements of cardiovascular disease was achieved to a greater extent by the concentrated rTG fish oil than by any other supplement. Krill oil and (unconcentrated) triglyceride oil were relatively unsuccessful in this aspect of the study.

conclusionFor the general population, the form and dose of omega-3 supplements may be immaterial. However, given these results, the form and dose may be important for those interested in reducing their risk of cardiovascular disease.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01960660.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Over StudiesDietary SupplementsEuphausiaceaFatty Acids, Omega-3Fish OilsHumansMiddle AgedTriglyceridesYoung AdultFatty Acids, Omega-3Fish Oilssalmon oilTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID24952576
PMCPMC4085663
OpenAlexW2113838437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.