Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25010532›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2015

Effect of cell origin and timing of delivery for stem cell-based bone tissue engineering using biologically functionalized hydrogels.

Christopher R Dosier, Brent A Uhrig, Nick J Willett, Laxminarayanan Krishnan, Mon-Tzu Alice Li, Hazel Y Stevens, Zvi Schwartz, Barbara D Boyan, Robert E Guldberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. It's All in the Delivery: Designing Hydrogels for Cell and Non-viral Gene Therapies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher R Dosier1 Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia .
Brent A Uhrig
Nick J Willett
Laxminarayanan Krishnan
Mon-Tzu Alice Li
Hazel Y Stevens
Zvi Schwartz
Barbara D Boyan
Robert E Guldberg
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in bone tissue engineering, the healing of critically sized diaphyseal defects remains a clinical challenge. A stem cell-based approach is an attractive alternative to current treatment techniques. The objective of this study was to examine the ability of adult stem cells to enhance bone formation when co-delivered with the osteoinductive factor bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in a biologically functionalized hydrogel. First, adipose and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs and BMMSCs) were screened for their potential to form bone when delivered in an RGD functionalized alginate hydrogel using a subcutaneous implant model. BMMSCs co-delivered with BMP-2 produced significantly more mineralized tissue compared with either ADSCs co-delivered with BMP-2 or acellular hydrogels containing BMP-2. Next, the ability of BMMSCs to heal a critically sized diaphyseal defect with a nonhealing dose of BMP-2 was tested using the alginate hydrogel as an injectable cell carrier. The effect of timing of therapeutic delivery on bone regeneration was also tested in the diaphyseal model. A 7 day delayed injection of the hydrogel into the defect site resulted in less mineralized tissue formation than immediate delivery of the hydrogel. By 12 weeks, BMMSC-loaded hydrogels produced significantly more bone than acellular constructs regardless of immediate or delayed treatment. For immediate delivery, bridging of defects treated with BMMSC-loaded hydrogels occurred at a rate of 75% compared with a 33% bridging rate for acellular-treated defects. No bridging was observed in any of the delayed delivery samples for any of the groups. Therefore, for this cell-based bone tissue engineering approach, immediate delivery of constructs leads to an overall enhanced healing response compared with delayed delivery techniques. Further, these studies demonstrate that co-delivery of adult stem cells, specifically BMMSCs, with BMP-2 enhances bone regeneration in a critically sized femoral segmental defect compared with acellular hydrogels containing BMP-2.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdipose TissueAlginatesAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBone and BonesCalcification, PhysiologicCD68 MoleculeCell SurvivalDiaphysesGlucuronic AcidGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHexuronic AcidsHydrogelsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlginatesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeDAPIGlucuronic AcidGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHexuronic AcidsHydrogelsIndoles

Identifiers

PMID25010532
PMCPMC4298752
OpenAlexW2052165602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.