Trial reportDrugs in R&D2014
Switching α-glucosidase inhibitors to miglitol reduced glucose fluctuations and circulating cardiovascular disease risk factors in type 2 diabetic Japanese patients.
Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors in Aging and Aging-Related Diseases: Clinical Applications and Relevant Mechanisms.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Quinazolinone-1,2,3-triazole-acetamide conjugates as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors: synthesis, enzyme inhibition, kinetic analysis, and molecular docking study.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular safety of non-insulin pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIn this study we examined the effects of switching α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GI) from acarbose or voglibose to miglitol on glucose fluctuations and circulating concentrations of cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as soluble adhesion molecules (sE-selectin, sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1), a chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and fatty acid-binding protein 4, in type 2 diabetic patients for 3 months.
methodsWe enrolled 47 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, with HbA1c levels with 7.26 ± 0.5 % (mean ± standard deviation), and who were treated with the highest approved dose of acarbose (100 mg/meal) or voglibose (0.3 mg/meal) in combination with insulin or sulfonylurea. Patients' prior α-GIs were switched to a medium dose of miglitol (50 mg/meal), and the new treatments were maintained for 3 months. Thirty-five patients who completed the 3-month study and provided serum samples were analyzed.
resultsThe switch to miglitol for 3 months did not affect HbA1c, fasting glucose, triglycerides, total-cholesterol or C-reactive protein levels, or result in any adverse events. Glucose fluctuations were significantly improved by the change in treatment (M-value: 10.54 ± 4.32 to 8.36 ± 2.54), while serum protein concentrations of MCP-1 (525.04 ± 288.06-428.11 ± 163.78 pg/mL) and sE-selectin (18.65 ± 9.77-14.50 ± 6.26 ng/mL) were suppressed.
conclusionOur results suggest that switching from acarbose or voglibose to miglitol for 3 months suppressed glucose fluctuations and serum protein levels of MCP-1 and sE-selectin in type 2 diabetic Japanese patients, with fewer adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.