Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25083839›Full record

ArticleCoronary artery disease2014

Predicting coronary no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using Bayesian approaches.

Dongfeng Zhang, Xiantao Song, Shuzheng Lv, Dong Li, Shuai Yan, Min Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Coronary artery disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongfeng ZhangaDepartment of Cardiology, Capital Medical University affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Disease bThe State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiantao Song
Shuzheng Lv
Dong Li
Shuai Yan
Min Zhang
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Anzhen Hospital · CNBeijing Proteome Research Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe no-reflow phenomenon is associated with a worse prognosis at follow-up for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. To date, there is no effective method to predict no-reflow. The aim of this study was to establish a predictive system to evaluate the risk of no-reflow by integrating multiple types of information using Bayesian methods. PATIENTS AND

methodsSTEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 h from the symptom onset between January 2008 and May 2013 were initially screened from the registry database of Anzhen Hospital (Beijing, China). Baseline clinical data, laboratory studies, and procedural characteristics were recorded. The Bayesian Model and Ten-Factor Model were used and compared with the Single-Factor Models. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to show the efficacy by presenting both sensitivity and specificity for different cutoff points.

resultsA total of 1059 consecutive STEMI patients were enrolled. Seventy-nine factors were collected to assess the confidence of the no-reflow phenomenon. The combined likelihood ratios were used to measure the reliability of the no-reflow phenomenon. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 and 0.79 for the Bayesian Model and Ten-Factors Model, respectively, whereas the Single-Factor Model yielded a maximum AUC of 0.67.

conclusionThe Bayesian Model showed high sensitivity and good specificity in predicting true relations between multiple factors and the no-reflow outcome.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedBayes TheoremCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMyocardial InfarctionNo-Reflow PhenomenonReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25083839
PMCPMC4222349
OpenAlexW2070247124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.