Evidence mapPaperPMID 25105547Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2014

Effectiveness of a new exercise program after lower limb arterial blood flow surgery in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Edita Jakubsevičienė, Donatas Vasiliauskas, Linas Velička, Raimondas Kubilius, Eglė Milinavičienė, Jonė Venclovienė

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brazilian Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Guideline - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edita JakubsevičienėInstitute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukilėlių St. 17, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania. edita.gegznaite@gmail.com.
Donatas VasiliauskasInstitute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukilėlių St. 17, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania. donatas.vasiliauskas@lsmuni.lt.
Linas VeličkaDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių St. 2, Kaunas 50009, Lithuania. lvelicka@gmail.com.
Raimondas KubiliusDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių St. 2, Kaunas 50009, Lithuania. raimondas@efarmacija.lt.
Eglė MilinavičienėViršužiglis Hospital of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Viršužiglis 53193, Lithuania. egle.milinaviciene@kaunoklinikos.lt.
Jonė VenclovienėInstitute of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukilėlių St. 17, Kaunas 50161, Lithuania. j.vencloviene@gmf.vdu.lt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised exercise program (SEP) plus at home nonsupervised exercise therapy (non-SET) on functional status, quality of life (QoL) and hemodynamic response in post-lower-limb bypass surgery patients.

resultsOne hundred and seventeen patients were randomized to an intervention (n = 57) or a control group (n = 60). A new individual SEP was designed for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and applied to the studied subjects of the intervention group who also continued non-SET at home, whereas those assigned to the control group received just usual SEP according to a common cardiovascular program. The participants of the study were assessed by a 6-min walking test (6 MWT), an ankle-brachial index (ABI), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) of QoL at baseline, at 1 and 6 months after surgery. A significant improvement was observed in the walked distance in the intervention group after 6 months compared with the control group (p < 0.001). The intervention group had significantly higher QoL score in the physical and mental component of SF-36 (p < 0.05).

conclusionsA 6-month application of the new SEP and non-SET at home has yielded significantly better results in walking distance and QoL in the intervention group than in the controls.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHemodynamicsQuality of LifeAgedAnkle Brachial IndexHumansLithuaniaLower ExtremityMalePeripheral Arterial DiseaseWalking

Identifiers

PMID25105547
PMCPMC4143843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.