Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25147807›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

The parameters of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are critical to its regenerative effects when applied just after a sciatic crush lesion in mice.

Diana Cavalcante Miranda de Assis, Êmyle Martins Lima, Bruno Teixeira Goes, João Zugaib Cavalcanti, Alaí Barbosa Paixão, Marcos André Vannier-Santos, Ana Maria Blanco Martinez, Abrahão Fontes Baptista

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Axon Regeneration After Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Animal Models and Humans.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diana Cavalcante Miranda de AssisPost-Graduation Program in Medicine and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Augusto Viana, Canela, 40110-060 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; Functional Electrostimulation Laboratory, Department of Biomorphology, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, S/N, Vale do Canela, 40110-902 Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8216-9755
Êmyle Martins LimaPost-Graduation Program in Medicine and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Augusto Viana, Canela, 40110-060 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; Functional Electrostimulation Laboratory, Department of Biomorphology, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, S/N, Vale do Canela, 40110-902 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Bruno Teixeira GoesGonçalo Moniz Research Center, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rua Waldemar Falcão, Candea, INCT-INPeTAm/MCT-CNPq, 40296-710 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; Biotechnology and Bioprospection Nucleus (NBBio), Bahian School of Medicine and Human Health, Rua Frei Henrique, 8 Nazaré, 40.050-420 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
João Zugaib CavalcantiPhysiology and Synaptic Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alaí Barbosa PaixãoFunctional Electrostimulation Laboratory, Department of Biomorphology, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, S/N, Vale do Canela, 40110-902 Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8396-8775
Marcos André Vannier-SantosGonçalo Moniz Research Center, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rua Waldemar Falcão, Candea, INCT-INPeTAm/MCT-CNPq, 40296-710 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; IBCCF, Cidade Universitária, Avenida Pedro Calmon, 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Maria Blanco MartinezNeuroregeneration and Repair Laboratory, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRJ, Avenida Pedro Calmon, Cidade Universitária, 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Abrahão Fontes BaptistaPost-Graduation Program in Medicine and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Rua Augusto Viana, Canela, 40110-060 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; Functional Electrostimulation Laboratory, Department of Biomorphology, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, S/N, Vale do Canela, 40110-902 Salvador, BA, Brazil ; Gonçalo Moniz Research Center, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rua Waldemar Falcão, Candea, INCT-INPeTAm/MCT-CNPq, 40296-710 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRCentro Universitário da Cidade · BREscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effect of two frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied immediately after lesion on peripheral nerve regeneration after a mouse sciatic crush injury. The animals were anesthetized and subjected to crushing of the right sciatic nerve and then separated into three groups: nontreated, Low-TENS (4 Hz), and High-TENS (100 Hz). The animals of Low- and High-TENS groups were stimulated for 2 h immediately after the surgical procedure, while the nontreated group was only positioned for the same period. After five weeks the animals were euthanized, and the nerves dissected bilaterally for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological assessment by light and electron microscopy showed that High-TENS and nontreated nerves had a similar profile, with extensive signs of degeneration. Conversely, Low-TENS led to increased regeneration, displaying histological aspects similar to control nerves. High-TENS also led to decreased density of fibers in the range of 6-12 μm diameter and decreased fiber diameter and myelin area in the range of 0-2 μm diameter. These findings suggest that High-TENS applied just after a peripheral nerve crush may be deleterious for regeneration, whereas Low-TENS may increase nerve regeneration capacity.

Indexed as

AnimalsMiceMyelin SheathNerve CrushNerve RegenerationSciatic NerveSciatic NeuropathyTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25147807
PMCPMC4131508
OpenAlexW2171921101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.