Evidence mapPaperPMID 25165484Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2014

Screening for prediabetes using machine learning models.

Soo Beom Choi, Won Jae Kim, Tae Keun Yoo, Jee Soo Park, Jai Won Chung, Yong-ho Lee, Eun Seok Kang, Deok Won Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving T2D machine learning-based prediction accuracy with SNPs and younger age.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soo Beom ChoiDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea ; Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3892-0630
Won Jae KimDepartment of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Tae Keun YooDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea ; Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Jee Soo ParkDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea ; Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Jai Won ChungDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea ; Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-ho LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-4942
Eun Seok KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Republic of Korea.
Deok Won KimDepartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea ; Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-8675
Yonsei University · KRYonsei University Health System · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global prevalence of diabetes is rapidly increasing. Studies support the necessity of screening and interventions for prediabetes, which could result in serious complications and diabetes. This study aimed at developing an intelligence-based screening model for prediabetes. Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were used, excluding subjects with diabetes. The KNHANES 2010 data (n = 4685) were used for training and internal validation, while data from KNHANES 2011 (n = 4566) were used for external validation. We developed two models to screen for prediabetes using an artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) and performed a systematic evaluation of the models using internal and external validation. We compared the performance of our models with that of a screening score model based on logistic regression analysis for prediabetes that had been developed previously. The SVM model showed the areas under the curve of 0.731 in the external datasets, which is higher than those of the ANN model (0.729) and the screening score model (0.712), respectively. The prescreening methods developed in this study performed better than the screening score model that had been developed previously and may be more effective method for prediabetes screening.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineAdultArea Under CurveHumansMalePrediabetic StateRandom AllocationRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25165484
PMCPMC4140121
OpenAlexW1971967573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.