Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25192061›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Two low coverage bird genomes and a comparison of reference-guided versus de novo genome assemblies.

Daren C Card, Drew R Schield, Jacobo Reyes-Velasco, Matthew K Fujita, Audra L Andrew, Sara J Oyler-McCance, Jennifer A Fike, Diana F Tomback, Robert P Ruggiero, Todd A Castoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomics of coloration in natural animal populations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daren C CardDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Drew R SchieldDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Jacobo Reyes-VelascoDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Matthew K FujitaDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Audra L AndrewDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
Sara J Oyler-McCanceUnited States Geological Survey - Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jennifer A FikeUnited States Geological Survey - Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Diana F TombackDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Robert P RuggieroDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Todd A CastoeDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a greater number and diversity of high-quality vertebrate reference genomes become available, it is increasingly feasible to use these references to guide new draft assemblies for related species. Reference-guided assembly approaches may substantially increase the contiguity and completeness of a new genome using only low levels of genome coverage that might otherwise be insufficient for de novo genome assembly. We used low-coverage (∼3.5-5.5x) Illumina paired-end sequencing to assemble draft genomes of two bird species (the Gunnison Sage-Grouse, Centrocercus minimus, and the Clark's Nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana). We used these data to estimate de novo genome assemblies and reference-guided assemblies, and compared the information content and completeness of these assemblies by comparing CEGMA gene set representation, repeat element content, simple sequence repeat content, and GC isochore structure among assemblies. Our results demonstrate that even lower-coverage genome sequencing projects are capable of producing informative and useful genomic resources, particularly through the use of reference-guided assemblies.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsBirdsComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25192061
PMCPMC4156343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.