Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25199733›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2014

How much neighborhood parks contribute to local residents' physical activity in the City of Los Angeles: a meta-analysis.

Bing Han, Deborah A Cohen, Kathryn Pitkin Derose, Terry Marsh, Stephanie Williamson, Laura Raaen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Gender Disparities in Park Use and Physical Activity among Residents of High-Poverty Neighborhoods in Los Angeles.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Trial
  3. Playground Design and Physical Activity.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Did Playground Renovations Equitably Benefit Neighborhoods in Chicago?Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Park Proximity and Use for Physical Activity among Urban Residents: Associations with Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contributions of Neighborhood Parks to Physical Activity in High-Poverty Urban Neighborhoods.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Violent Crime and Park Use in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bing HanRAND Corporation, United States. Electronic address: bhan@rand.org.
Deborah A CohenRAND Corporation, United States.
Kathryn Pitkin DeroseRAND Corporation, United States.
Terry MarshRAND Corporation, United States.
Stephanie WilliamsonRAND Corporation, United States.
Laura RaaenRAND Corporation, United States.

Funding

Promoting Physical Activity in High Poverty NeighborhoodsR01HL114283 · NHLBI · RAND CORPORATION · PI COHEN, DEBORAH A · 2013 to 2016
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114283NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL114283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the contribution of neighborhood parks to population-level, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

methodWe studied park use in 83 neighborhood parks in Los Angeles between 2003 and 2014 using systematic observation and surveys of park users and local residents. We observed park use at least 3-4 times per day over 4-7 clement days. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate total, age group and gender-specific park use and total MVPA time in parks.

resultsAn average park measuring 10 acres and with 40,000 local residents in a one-mile radius accrued 5301 h of use (SE=1083) during one week, with 35% (1850 h) spent in MVPA and 12% (635 h) spent in vigorous physical activity (VPA). As much as a 10.7-fold difference in weekly MVPA hours was estimated across study parks. Parks' main contribution to population-level MVPA is for males, teenagers, and residents living within a half mile.

conclusionNeighborhood parks contribute substantially to population MVPA. The contribution may depend less on size and facilities than on "demand goods" - programming and activities--that draw users to a park.

Indexed as

Environment DesignMotor ActivityRecreationAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLeisure ActivitiesLos AngelesMaleMaps as TopicMiddle AgedModels, Statisticalmeta-analysisMVPAneighborhood parks

Identifiers

PMID25199733
PMCPMC4268157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.