Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25218862›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2014

New genes contribute to genetic and phenotypic novelties in human evolution.

Yong E Zhang, Manyuan Long

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. The evolutionary origin of psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  11. The Theory ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Secondary Structure of HumanFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  20. Comparative Analysis of HSF Genes FromFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yong E ZhangKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution & State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhangyong@ioz.ac.cn.
Manyuan LongDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA. Electronic address: mlong@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Genomic analysis of feeding behavior and fitness in DrosophilaR01GM100768 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LONG, MANYUAN, ZHUANG, XIAOXI · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100768NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM100768-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New genes in human genomes have been found relevant in evolution and biology of humans. It was conservatively estimated that the human genome encodes more than 300 human-specific genes and 1000 primate-specific genes. These new arrivals appear to be implicated in brain function and male reproduction. Surprisingly, increasing evidence indicates that they may also bring negative pleiotropic effects, while assuming various possible biological functions as sources of phenotypic novelties, suggesting a non-progressive route for functional evolution. Similar to these fixed new genes, polymorphic new genes were found to contribute to functional evolution within species, for example, with respect to digestion or disease resistance, revealing that new genes can acquire new or diverged functions in its initial stage as prototypic genes. These progresses have provided new opportunities to explore the genetic basis of human biology and human evolutionary history in a new dimension.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGenotypeHominidaeHumansPhenotypeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25218862
PMCPMC4631527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.