Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228247›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Predicting disease associations via biological network analysis.

Kai Sun, Joana P Gonçalves, Chris Larminie, Nataša Przulj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Map Disease Relationships Challenges Classical Disease Views.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring novel disease-disease associations based on multi-view fusion network.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PCOSKBScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Methods for Identifying Similar Diseases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The multiplex network of human diseases.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai Sun
Joana P Gonçalves
Chris Larminie
Nataša PrzuljDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. natasha@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the relationship between diseases based on the underlying biological mechanisms is one of the greatest challenges in modern biology and medicine. Exploring disease-disease associations by using system-level biological data is expected to improve our current knowledge of disease relationships, which may lead to further improvements in disease diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.

resultsWe took advantage of diverse biological data including disease-gene associations and a large-scale molecular network to gain novel insights into disease relationships. We analysed and compared four publicly available disease-gene association datasets, then applied three disease similarity measures, namely annotation-based measure, function-based measure and topology-based measure, to estimate the similarity scores between diseases. We systematically evaluated disease associations obtained by these measures against a statistical measure of comorbidity which was derived from a large number of medical patient records. Our results show that the correlation between our similarity measures and comorbidity scores is substantially higher than expected at random, confirming that our similarity measures are able to recover comorbidity associations. We also demonstrated that our predicted disease associations correlated with disease associations generated from genome-wide association studies significantly higher than expected at random. Furthermore, we evaluated our predicted disease associations via mining the literature on PubMed, and presented case studies to demonstrate how these novel disease associations can be used to enhance our current knowledge of disease relationships.

conclusionsWe present three similarity measures for predicting disease associations. The strong correlation between our predictions and known disease associations demonstrates the ability of our measures to provide novel insights into disease relationships.

Indexed as

DiseaseGene OntologyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPubMed

Identifiers

PMID25228247
PMCPMC4174675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.