Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25243022›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2014

Better detection of platelet aggregation in patients with metabolic syndrome using epinephrine and ADP.

Laura Perez-Campos-Mayoral, Eduardo Pérez-Campos, Edgar Zenteno, Abraham Majluf-Cruz, Eduardo Perez-Ortega, Diana Matias-Pérez, Francisco J Rodal-Canales, Ruth Martínez-Cruz, Socorro Pina-Canseco, Miguel Angel Reyes Franco and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Insulin resistance in ischemic stroke.Metabolic brain disease · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Perez-Campos-MayoralCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Laboratorio de Patologia Clinica "Dr. Eduardo Pérez Ortega, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Eduardo Pérez-CamposCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Laboratorio de Patologia Clinica "Dr. Eduardo Pérez Ortega, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Unidad de Bioquimica e Inmunologia Instituto Tecnologico de Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Edgar ZentenoCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Departamento de Bioquimica, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Kragujevac, DF Mexico.
Abraham Majluf-CruzUnidad de Investigacion Medica en Trombosis, Hemostasia y Aterogenesis, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eduardo Perez-OrtegaLaboratorio de Patologia Clinica "Dr. Eduardo Pérez Ortega, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Diana Matias-PérezCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Laboratorio de Patologia Clinica "Dr. Eduardo Pérez Ortega, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Francisco J Rodal-CanalesCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Ruth Martínez-CruzCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Socorro Pina-CansecoCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Miguel Angel Reyes FrancoCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Gabriel Mayoral AndradeCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico ; Unidad de Bioquimica e Inmunologia Instituto Tecnologico de Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Pedro HernándezCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Belem GallegosCentro de Investigacion UNAM-UABJO, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, CIMUU, Zaragoza, 213, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Benito Juárez Autonomous University of Oaxaca · MXInstituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with metabolic syndrome (MS) often have increased platelet aggregation. In order to determine which concentration detects a higher level of platelet aggregation in patients with MS, the agonists ADP and epinephrine were compared.

methodsThe study included 56 subjects with MS and 53 healthy subjects. Blood pressure, weight, body-mass index, and hip-to-waist ratio were collected from all subjects. Insulin, glucose, total serum cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, total triglycerides, markers of plasma atherogenicity, and indices of insulin resistance were measured in all participants. For aggregometry assays, the Born method was used. Platelets were treated with ADP and epinephrine in decreasing concentrations of 2.34, 1.17, and 0.58 μM, as well as, 11.0, 1.1, and 0.55 μM, respectively. ROC curves were plotted to define the diagnostic efficiency of epinephrine levels for MS.

resultsAmong healthy individuals and MS patients significant differences were observed in body weight, body-mass index, waist-circumference, levels of insulin, indices of insulin resistance, and levels of HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and total triglycerides. There was a significant difference in the detection of increased platelet aggregation using 11.0 μM and 0.55 μM epinephrine and 0.58 μM ADP. With both agonists, ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of >0.8 for 11.0 μM epinephrine and 2.34 μM ADP. However, for MS patients, 11.0 μM epinephrine had a slightly better diagnostic efficiency than 2.34 μM ADP.

conclusionsIt was found that 11.0 μM epinephrine and 2.34 μM ADP detected better platelet aggregation in patients with MS than in healthy subject. Both concentrations detected increased platelet aggregation in patients with MS.

Indexed as

ADPEpinephrineMetabolic syndromePlatelets

Identifiers

PMID25243022
PMCPMC4169807
OpenAlexW2145426733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.