Evidence mapPaperPMID 25324324Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

Task shifting interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Gbenga Ogedegbe, Joyce Gyamfi, Jacob Plange-Rhule, Alisa Surkis, Diana Margot Rosenthal, Collins Airhihenbuwa, Juliet Iwelunmor, Richard Cooper

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Maintenance Dialysis throughout the World in Years 1990 and 2010.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2015
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gbenga OgedegbeDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Joyce GyamfiDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Jacob Plange-RhuleSchool of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Alisa SurkisNYU Health Sciences Libraries, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Diana Margot RosenthalDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Collins AirhihenbuwaDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Juliet IwelunmorDepartment of Kinesiology and Community health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Richard CooperStritch School of Medicine, Loyola Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009140FIC NIH HHS D43TW009140NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL111315NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL114198NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL114198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate evidence from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the use of task-shifting strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

designSystematic review of RCTs that utilised a task-shifting strategy in the management of CVD in LMICs. DATA SOURCES: We searched the following databases for relevant RCTs: PubMed from the 1940s, EMBASE from 1974, Global Health from 1910, Ovid Health Star from 1966, Web of Knowledge from 1900, Scopus from 1823, CINAHL from 1937 and RCTs from ClinicalTrials.gov. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We focused on RCTs published in English, but without publication year. We included RCTs in which the intervention used task shifting (non-physician healthcare workers involved in prescribing of medications, treatment and/or medical testing) and non-physician healthcare providers in the management of CV risk factors and diseases (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, stroke, coronary artery disease or heart failure), as well as RCTs that were conducted in LMICs. We excluded studies that are not RCTs.

resultsOf the 2771 articles identified, only three met the predefined criteria. All three trials were conducted in practice-based settings among patients with hypertension (2 studies) and diabetes (1 study), with one study also incorporating home visits. The duration of the studies ranged from 3 to 12 months, and the task-shifting strategies included provision of medication prescriptions by nurses, community health workers and pharmacists and telephone follow-up posthospital discharge. Both hypertension studies reported a significant mean blood pressure reduction (2/1 mm Hg and 30/15 mm Hg), and the diabetes trial reported a reduction in the glycated haemoglobin levels of 1.87%.

conclusionsThere is a dearth of evidence on the implementation of task-shifting strategies to reduce the burden of CVD in LMICs. Effective task-shifting interventions targeted at reducing the global CVD epidemic in LMICs are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PersonnelRisk Reduction BehaviorCardiovascular DiseasesCounselingHumansMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationWorkloadCardiovascular diseasesDiabetesLow-and middle-income countriesSystematic reviewTask shifting

Identifiers

PMID25324324
PMCPMC4202019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.