Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25394176›Full record

ReviewGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2015

Toward an improved definition of the genetic and tumor spectrum associated with SDH germ-line mutations.

Lucie Evenepoel, Thomas G Papathomas, Niels Krol, Esther Korpershoek, Ronald R de Krijger, Alexandre Persu, Winand N M Dinjens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Human SDHA-Knockout Cell Line Model for the Functional Analysis of Clinically Relevant SDHA Variants.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PreferentialJournal of clinical pathology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Hereditary Endocrine Tumor Registries.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Somatic Mutation Profiling in Head and Neck Paragangliomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Contemporary management of paragangliomas of the head and neck.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucie Evenepoel1] Pole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium [2] Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands [3] Human Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas G PapathomasDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels KrolDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther KorpershoekDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald R de Krijger1] Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands [2] Department of Pathology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Alexandre PersuPole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Winand N M DinjensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLde Duve Institute · BEReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tricarboxylic acid, or Krebs, cycle is central to the cellular metabolism of sugars, lipids, and amino acids; it fuels the mitochondrial respiratory chain for energy generation. In the past decade, mutations in the Krebs-cycle enzymes succinate dehydrogenase, fumarate hydratase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase have been documented to be causally involved in carcinogenesis. This review is focused on the relationship between SDH mutations and the carcinogenic phenotype. The succinate dehydrogenase complex catalyzes the oxidation of succinate to fumarate; mutations in its subunits SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD, and in the assembly factor SDHAF2, result in syndromes with distinct tumor types, including pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and, less often, renal-cell carcinoma and pituitary adenoma. In this study we collected all previously reported SDH mutations with the aim of defining their nature and tumor spectrum. In addition, genotype-phenotype correlations as well as mechanisms of biallelic inactivation were analyzed in the SDH-deficient setting. Finally, we performed bioinformatics analysis using SIFT, Polyphen2, and Mutation Assessor to predict the functional impact of nonsynonymous mutations. The prediction of the latter was further compared with available SDHA and/or SDHB immunohistochemistry data.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsSuccinate DehydrogenaseSuccinate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID25394176
OpenAlexW2057322654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.