Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25406330›Full record

GuidelineHerz2014

[ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization : Amendments 2014].

H Nef, M Renker, C W Hamm, European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Abstract readEnglish AbstractPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Herz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFRWorld journal of cardiology · 2018
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H NefMedizinische Klinik I, Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland, holger.nef@me.com.
M Renker
C W Hamm
European Society of Cardiology
European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most important treatment principles in interventional cardiology relies on myocardial revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or surgical placement of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). However, in order to apply these principles effectively, it is important to identify patients who require revascularization. Consequently, the appropriate method has to be selected to effectively restore blood flow. Patients will only benefit from the interventional or surgical procedures when those revascularization measures that can cause more harm than good are avoided. In the new European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines on myocardial revascularization some new aspects will be addressed.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionCardiologyCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularEuropeHumansPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID25406330
OpenAlexW195712156

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.