Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414844›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2014

Joint Analyses of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data in Research on Aging: Implications for Predicting Health and Survival.

Konstantin G Arbeev, Igor Akushevich, Alexander M Kulminski, Svetlana V Ukraintseva, Anatoliy I Yashin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Alzheimer's Disease Exposome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dynamics of biomarkers in relation to aging and mortality.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konstantin G ArbeevCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Igor AkushevichCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Alexander M KulminskiCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Svetlana V UkraintsevaCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Anatoliy I YashinCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.

Funding

STALLARD Admin Supp: Predicting Future Care Needs and Costs for Individual Medicare Enrollees with Incident Suspected Alzheimer's DiseaseP30AG034424 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Herman Pontzer · 2009 to 2026
$12.2M
THE RANGE OF MALE-FEMALE MORTALITY DIFFERENCESP01AG031719 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTENSEN, KAARE · 2009 to 2020
$10.2M
Relationships among Genetic Regulators of Aging Health and LifespanP01AG043352 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2014 to 2018
$8.7M
Genetics of changes in population pyramids: Implications for health forecasting with a focus on Alzheimer's Disease and related dementiasRF1AG046860 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2019 to 2019
$3.1M
YASHIN Admin Supp: Time Trends in Alzheimer's Disease: Addressing the Changing Role of Risk Factors and Instrument ValidityR01AG046860 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043352NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034424NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046860NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG046860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal data on aging, health, and longevity provide a wealth of information to investigate different aspects of the processes of aging and development of diseases leading to death. Statistical methods aimed at analyses of time-to-event data jointly with longitudinal measurements became known as the "joint models" (JM). An important point to consider in analyses of such data in the context of studies on aging, health, and longevity is how to incorporate knowledge and theories about mechanisms and regularities of aging-related changes that accumulate in the research field into respective analytic approaches. In the absence of specific observations of longitudinal dynamics of relevant biomarkers manifesting such mechanisms and regularities, traditional approaches have a rather limited utility to estimate respective parameters that can be meaningfully interpreted from the biological point of view. A conceptual analytic framework for these purposes, the stochastic process model of aging (SPM), has been recently developed in the biodemographic literature. It incorporates available knowledge about mechanisms of aging-related changes, which may be hidden in the individual longitudinal trajectories of physiological variables and this allows for analyzing their indirect impact on risks of diseases and death. Despite, essentially, serving similar purposes, JM and SPM developed in parallel in different disciplines with very limited cross-referencing. Although there were several publications separately reviewing these two approaches, there were no publications presenting both these approaches in some detail. Here, we overview both approaches jointly and provide some new modifications of SPM. We discuss the use of stochastic processes to capture biological variation and heterogeneity in longitudinal patterns and important and promising (but still largely underused) applications of JM and SPM to predictions of individual and population mortality and health-related outcomes.

Indexed as

agingforecastinghealthjoint modelmortalitystochastic process modeltrajectory

Identifiers

PMID25414844
PMCPMC4222133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.