Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25423963›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Epigenetic memory of the first cell fate decision prevents complete ES cell reprogramming into trophoblast.

Francesco Cambuli, Alexander Murray, Wendy Dean, Dominika Dudzinska, Felix Krueger, Simon Andrews, Claire E Senner, Simon J Cook, Myriam Hemberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Morula-derived trophectoderm stem cells.Nature cell biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Conserved and divergent features of trophoblast stem cells.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Epigenetic Role of Vitamin C in Neurodevelopment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Generating Trophoblast Stem Cells from Human Naïve Pluripotent Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco Cambuli1] Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK [2] Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Alexander Murray1] Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK [2] Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Wendy DeanEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Dominika Dudzinska1] Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK [2] Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Felix KruegerBioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Simon AndrewsBioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Claire E Senner1] Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK [2] Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Simon J CookSignalling Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Myriam Hemberger1] Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK [2] Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK [3] Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000C199Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0417Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0419Cancer Research UK 14867Medical Research Council MR/L00027X/1Worldwide Cancer Research 12-1259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic (ES) and trophoblast (TS) stem cells reflect the first, irrevocable cell fate decision in development that is reinforced by distinct epigenetic lineage barriers. Nonetheless, ES cells can seemingly acquire TS-like characteristics upon manipulation of lineage-determining transcription factors or activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (Erk1/2) pathway. Here we have interrogated the progression of reprogramming in ES cell models with regulatable Oct4 and Cdx2 transgenes or conditional Erk1/2 activation. Although trans-differentiation into TS-like cells is initiated, lineage conversion remains incomplete in all models, underpinned by the failure to demethylate a small group of TS cell genes. Forced expression of these non-reprogrammed genes improves trans-differentiation efficiency, but still fails to confer a stable TS cell phenotype. Thus, even ES cells in ground-state pluripotency cannot fully overcome the boundaries that separate the first cell lineages but retain an epigenetic memory of their ES cell origin.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCDX2 Transcription FactorEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeodomain ProteinsMiceOctamer Transcription Factor-3Transcription FactorsTrophoblastsCdx2 protein, mouseCDX2 Transcription FactorHomeodomain ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25423963
PMCPMC4263130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.