Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25447301›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural brain research2015

The effects of energy balance, obesity-proneness and sex on the neuronal response to sweet taste.

Marc-Andre Cornier, Megan E Shott, Elizabeth A Thomas, Jamie L Bechtell, Daniel H Bessesen, Jason R Tregellas, Guido K Frank

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sex/gender differences in neural correlates of food stimuli: a systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc-Andre CornierDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: marc.cornier@ucdenver.edu.
Megan E ShottDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Elizabeth A ThomasDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jamie L BechtellDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Daniel H BessesenDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jason R TregellasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Research Service, VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Guido K FrankDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BRYAN C BERGMAN · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000154 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$20.4M
Taste reward circuits and prediction error define eating disorder psychopathologyR01MH103436 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STODDARD, JOEL JOHNSON · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Neuronal Effects of Exercise on SchizophreniaR01MH102224 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TREGELLAS, JASON R · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
The Effects of Enerty Imbalance on Food Intake BehaviorsR01DK072174 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CORNIER, MARC-ANDRE · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Neuronal and Behavioral Effects of Implicit Priming in Obese IndividualsR21DK102052 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TREGELLAS, JASON R · 2014 to 2015
$427k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000154NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS DK48520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072174NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK072174NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK102052NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102224NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously shown that propensity for weight gain, energy balance state and sex are important determinants of the neuronal response to visual food cues. It is not clear, though, whether these factors also impact the neuronal response to taste. The objective of this study was to examine the neuronal response to sweet taste during energy imbalance in men and women recruited to be obesity-prone (OP) or obesity-resistant (OR). OP (13 men and 12 women) and OR (12 men and 12 women) subjects were studied after 1 day of eucaloric, overfed and underfed conditions in a randomized crossover design. On each test day, fMRI was performed in the respective acute fed state while subjects received in random order 60 trials each of 1M sucrose solution (SU), or artificial saliva (AS) following a visual cue predicting the taste. The neuronal response to SU versus AS expectation was significantly greater in the amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen and insula in OR versus OP; SU receipt was not different between groups. There were also sex-based differences with men having greater neuronal response to SU versus AS receipt in the caudate than women. The results, however, were not impacted by the state of energy balance. In summary, response to expectation but not receipt of basic sweet taste was different in OR compared to OP, highlighting the importance of learning and conditioning in the propensity to gain weight. Response to sucrose taste receipt was stronger in men than women, raising questions about the effect of sex hormones on brain response to food.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultBrainEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObesityOxygenStatistics as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesSweetening AgentsTasteOxygenSweetening AgentsfMRINeuroimagingOverfeedingSexSucroseUnderfeeding

Identifiers

PMID25447301
PMCPMC4382429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.