Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25452541›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.

Lindsay Blank, Susan Baxter, Helen Buckley Woods, Elizabeth Goyder, Andrew Lee, Nick Payne, Melanie Rimmer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating referrals between rural district hospitals and a regional hospital in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Organization of primary care.Primary health care research & development · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsay BlankSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Susan BaxterSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Helen Buckley WoodsSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Elizabeth GoyderSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Andrew LeeSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Nick PayneSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Melanie RimmerSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.

Funding

Department of Health 11/1022/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemand management defines any method used to monitor, direct, or regulate patient referrals. Strategies have been developed to manage the referral of patients to secondary care, with interventions that target primary care, specialist services, or infrastructure.

aimTo review the international evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist care. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review.

methodIterative, systematic searches of published and unpublished sources public health, health management, management, and grey literature databases from health care and other industries were undertaken to identify recent, relevant studies. A narrative synthesis of the data was completed to structure the evidence into groups of similar interventions.

resultsThe searches generated 8327 unique results, of which 140 studies were included. Interventions were grouped into four intervention categories: GP education (n = 50); process change (n = 49); system change (n = 38); and patient-focused (n = 3). It is clear that there is no 'magic bullet' to managing demand for secondary care services: although some groups of interventions may have greater potential for development, given the existing evidence that they can be effective in specific contexts.

conclusionsTo tackle demand management of primary care services, the focus cannot be on primary care alone; a whole-systems approach is needed because the introduction of interventions in primary care is often just the starting point of the referral process. In addition, more research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions that acknowledge the role of the patient in the referral decision.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSecondary Health CareUnited Kingdomdemand managementgeneral practicenarrative synthesisprimary carereferralsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25452541
PMCPMC4240149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.