ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging2014
Imaging in pancreatic transplants.
Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreas transplantation rejection.European radiology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of imaging in pancreas transplantation: a primer for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Accessibility of Percutaneous Biopsy in Retrocolic-Placed Pancreatic Grafts With a Duodeno-Duodenostomy.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Article
- Comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography (CTA) and computed tomography venography (CTV) in the diagnosis of arteriovenous thrombosis after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Pre-hepatic and pre-pancreatic transplant donor evaluation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic transplantation, performed alone or in conjunction with kidney transplantation, is an effective treatment for advanced type I diabetes mellitus and select patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Following advancements in surgical technique, postoperative management, and immunosuppression, pancreatic transplantation has significantly improved the length and quality of life for patients suffering from pancreatic dysfunction. While computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have more limited utility, ultrasound is the preferred initial imaging modality to evaluate the transplanted pancreas; gray-scale assesses the parenchyma and fluid collections, while Doppler interrogation assesses vascular flow and viability. Ultrasound is also useful to guide percutaneous interventions for the transplanted pancreas. With knowledge of the surgical anatomy and common complications, the abdominal radiologist plays a central role in the perioperative and postoperative evaluation of the transplanted pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.