ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2015
Contribution of HIV-1 genomes that do not integrate to the basic reproductive ratio of the virus.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- HIV Preintegration Transcription and Host Antagonism.Current HIV research · 2023Article
- Tat controls transcriptional persistence of unintegrated HIV genome in primary human macrophages.Virology · 2018Article
- Single-cell analysis of HIV-1 transcriptional activity reveals expression of proviruses in expanded clones during ART.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- HIV-1 latency and virus production from unintegrated genomes following direct infection of resting CD4 T cells.Retrovirology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent experimental data indicate that HIV-1 DNA that fails to integrate (from now on called uDNA) can by itself successfully produce infectious offspring virions in resting T cells that become activated after infection. This scenario is likely important at the initial stages of the infection. We use mathematical models to calculate the relative contribution of unintegrated and integrated viral DNA to the basic reproductive ratio of the virus, R0, and the models are parameterized with preliminary data. This is done in the context of both free virus spread and transmission of the virus through virological synapses. For free virus transmission, we find that under preliminary parameter estimates, uDNA might contribute about 20% to the total R0. This requires that a single copy of uDNA can successfully replicate. If the presence of more than one uDNA copy is required for replication, uDNA does not contribute to R0. For synaptic transmission, uDNA can contribute to R0 regardless of the number of uDNA copies required for replication. The larger the number of viruses that are successfully transmitted per synapse, however, the lower the contribution of uDNA to R0 because this increases the chances that at least one virus integrates. Using available parameter values, uDNA can maximally contribute 20% to R0 in this case. We argue that the contribution of uDNA to virus reproduction might also be important for continued low level replication of HIV-1 in the presence of integrase inhibitor therapy. Assuming a 20% contribution of uDNA to the overall R0, our calculations suggest that R0=1.6 in the absence of virus integration. While these are rough estimates based on preliminary data that are currently available, this analysis provides a framework for future experimental work which should directly measure key parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.