Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2015
Can phone-based motivational interviewing improve medication adherence to antiplatelet medications after a coronary stent among racial minorities? A randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of sustained knowledge translation (KT) interventions in chronic disease management in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of non-adherence to antihypertensive medication in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Pooled it
- Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Motivational Interviewing Improves Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Income and antiplatelet adherence following percutaneous coronary intervention.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2022Article
- One more wall to cross: The role of psychologists in addressing integrated health among undocumented Latinx immigrants in inpatient medical settings.Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) · 2022Article
- Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.Circulation. Heart failure · 2022Article
- Identifying Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in the Use of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.The Journal of invasive cardiology · 2022Article
- Prescribing and medical non-adherence after myocardial infarction: qualitative interviews with general practitioners in Germany.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Non-Adherence to Prescribed Antihypertensives in Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Healthcare Settings in Islamabad, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Observational
- Adherence to Newly Prescribed Diabetes Medications Among Insured Latino and White Patients With Diabetes.JAMA internal medicine · 2017Observational
- Impact of pharmacy care upon adherence to cardiovascular medicines: a feasibility pilot controlled trial.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2016Article
- Improving HCV cure rates in HIV-coinfected patients - a real-world perspective.The American journal of managed care · 2016Article
- Phone-based motivational interviewing to increase self-efficacy in individuals with phenylketonuria.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2016Article
- Can We Identify Minority Patients at Risk of Nonadherence to Antiplatelet Medication at the Time of Coronary Stent Placement?The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinorities have lower adherence to cardiovascular medications and have worst cardiovascular outcomes post coronary stent placement
objectiveThe aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of phone-delivered Motivational Interviewing (MINT) to an educational video at improving adherence to antiplatelet medications among insured minorities.
designThis was a randomized study.
participantsWe identified minorities with a recently placed coronary stent from an administrative data set by using a previously validated algorithm.
interventionsMINT subjects received quarterly phone calls and the DVD group received a one-time mailed video. MAIN MEASURES: Outcome variables were collected at baseline and at 12-month post-stent, using surveys and administrative data. The primary outcome was antiplatelet (clopidogrel and prasugrel) adherence measured by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) and self- reported adherence (Morisky score). We also measured appropriate adherence defined as an MPR ≥ 0.80. KEY
resultsWe recruited 452 minority subjects with a new coronary stent (44 % Hispanics and 56 % Black). The patients had a mean age of 69.5 ± 8.8, 58 % were males, 78 % had an income lower than $30,000 per year and only 22 % had achieved high school education or higher. The MPR for antiplatelet medications was 0.77 for the MINT group compared to 0.70 for the DVD group (p < 0.05). The percentage of subjects with adequate adherence to their antiplatelet medication was 64 % in the MINT group and 50 % in the DVD group (p < 0.01). Self-reported adherence at 12 months was higher in the MINT group compared to the DVD group (p < 0.01). Results were similar among drug-eluting stent (DES) recipients.
conclusionsAmong racial minorities, a phone-based motivational interview is effective at improving adherence to antiplatelet medications post coronary stent placement. Phone-based MINT seems to be a promising and cost-effective strategy to modify risk behaviors among minority populations at high cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.