Evidence mapPaperPMID 25562265Full record

Observational studyJAMA2015

Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality.

Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group, Trevor J Orchard, David M Nathan, Bernard Zinman, Patricia Cleary, David Brillon, Jye-Yu C Backlund, John M Lachin

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03819790 phase4completedstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Variability of Glucose Assessed in a Randomized Trial Comparing the Initiation of A Treatment Approach With Biosimilar Basal Insulin Analog Or a Titratable iGlarLixi combinatioN in Type 2 Diabetes Among South Asian Subjects (VARIATION 2 SA Trial)

Ran2018Enrolled119Registered outcomes30Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsBasal insulin Basaglar/Lantus + gliclazide MR, Basal insulin glargine and lixisenatide, Metformin
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00360815 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Ran1983 to 1993Enrolled1,441ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsInsulin
NCT00360893 active not recruitingnot on this map

Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC)

TypeobservationalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan1994 to 2027Enrolled1,441ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT05147324 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Individualized Planned Eating Patterns to Improve Glycemic Management in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2021 to 2023Enrolled52ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArms"MyPlan" - Individualized Planned Eating Pattern
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group
Trevor J OrchardUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David M NathanMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bernard ZinmanLunefeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia ClearyThe George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, Maryland.
David BrillonCornell University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jye-Yu C BacklundThe George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, Maryland.
John M LachinThe George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) StudyU01DK094157 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$8.0M
Continuation of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Biostatistics CenterU01DK094176 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ionut Bebu, Barbara Halina Braffett · 2022 to 2022
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094157NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceWhether mortality in type 1 diabetes mellitus is affected following intensive glycemic therapy has not been established.

objectiveTo determine whether mortality differed between the original intensive and conventional treatment groups in the long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsAfter the DCCT (1983-1993) ended, participants were followed up in a multisite (27 US and Canadian academic clinical centers) observational study (Epidemiology of Diabetes Control and Complications [EDIC]) until December 31, 2012. Participants were 1441 healthy volunteers with diabetes mellitus who, at baseline, were 13 to 39 years of age with 1 to 15 years of diabetes duration and no or early microvascular complications, and without hypertension, preexisting cardiovascular disease, or other potentially life-threatening disease. INTERVENTIONS AND EXPOSURES: During the clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned to receive intensive therapy (n = 711) aimed at achieving glycemia as close to the nondiabetic range as safely possible, or conventional therapy (n = 730) with the goal of avoiding symptomatic hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. At the end of the DCCT, after a mean of 6.5 years, intensive therapy was taught and recommended to all participants and diabetes care was returned to personal physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total and cause-specific mortality was assessed through annual contact with family and friends and through records over 27 years' mean follow-up.

resultsVital status was ascertained for 1429 (99.2%) participants. There were 107 deaths, 64 in the conventional and 43 in the intensive group. The absolute risk difference was -109 per 100,000 patient-years (95% CI, -218 to -1), with lower all-cause mortality risk in the intensive therapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46-0.99]; P = .045). Primary causes of death were cardiovascular disease (24 deaths; 22.4%), cancer (21 deaths; 19.6%), acute diabetes complications (19 deaths; 17.8%), and accidents or suicide (18 deaths; 16.8%). Higher levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 1.56 [95% CI, 1.35-1.81 per 10% relative increase in HbA1c]; P < .001), as well as the development of albuminuria (HR = 2.20 [95% CI, 1.46-3.31]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After a mean of 27 years' follow-up of patients with type 1 diabetes, 6.5 years of initial intensive diabetes therapy was associated with a modestly lower all-cause mortality rate when compared with conventional therapy.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00360815 and NCT00360893.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Hypoglycemic AgentsAdolescentAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25562265
PMCPMC4306335

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.