ReviewBiosensors2014
Recent advances in bioprinting and applications for biosensing.
Review in Biosensors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soft lithography-based biomolecule patterning techniques and their applications in subcellular protein interaction analysis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Development of a 3D printed liquid-core hydrogel platform for real-time carbon nanotube sensors.Emergent materials · 2025Article
- Advances in cell-based biosensors: Transforming food flavor evaluation with novel approaches.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- The cutting-edge progress in bioprinting for biomedicine: principles, applications, and future perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
- Personalized additive manufacturing of devices for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulas.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Nanocomposite Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Its Potential to Develop Sensors for Cancer with Improved Performance.Biosensors · 2022Review
- A Simplified and Robust Activation Procedure of Glass Surfaces for Printing Proteins and Subcellular Micropatterning Experiments.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Solid-Phase Microcontact Printing for Precise Patterning of Rough Surfaces: Using Polymer-Tethered Elastomeric Stamps for the Transfer of Reactive Silanes.ACS applied polymer materials · 2021Article
- Novel Methods and Approaches for Safety Evaluation of Nanoparticle Formulations: A Focus TowardsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Using a bio-scanner and 3D printing to create an innovative custom made approach for the management of complex entero-atmospheric fistulas.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Skin-Integrated Wearable Systems and Implantable Biosensors: A Comprehensive Review.Biosensors · 2020Review
- Laser-based 3D bioprinting for spatial and size control of tumor spheroids and embryoid bodies.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Article
- Self Assembled Recombinant Proteins on Metallic Nanoparticles As Bimodal Imaging Probes.JOM (Warrendale, Pa. : 1989) · 2019Article
- A biofunctionalizable ink platform composed of catechol-modified chitosan and reduced graphene oxide/platinum nanocomposite.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017Article
- Bioimprinting as a tool for the detection of aflatoxin B1 using a capacitive biosensor.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2016Article
- Convection-Enhanced Biopatterning with Recirculation of Hydrodynamically Confined Nanoliter Volumes of Reagents.Analytical chemistry · 2016Article
- Recent Advances in Biosensor Technology for Potential Applications - An Overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2016Review
- Review
- Antibiotic and chemotherapeutic enhanced three-dimensional printer filaments and constructs for biomedical applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Future biosensing applications will require high performance, including real-time monitoring of physiological events, incorporation of biosensors into feedback-based devices, detection of toxins, and advanced diagnostics. Such functionality will necessitate biosensors with increased sensitivity, specificity, and throughput, as well as the ability to simultaneously detect multiple analytes. While these demands have yet to be fully realized, recent advances in biofabrication may allow sensors to achieve the high spatial sensitivity required, and bring us closer to achieving devices with these capabilities. To this end, we review recent advances in biofabrication techniques that may enable cutting-edge biosensors. In particular, we focus on bioprinting techniques (e.g., microcontact printing, inkjet printing, and laser direct-write) that may prove pivotal to biosensor fabrication and scaling. Recent biosensors have employed these fabrication techniques with success, and further development may enable higher performance, including multiplexing multiple analytes or cell types within a single biosensor. We also review recent advances in 3D bioprinting, and explore their potential to create biosensors with live cells encapsulated in 3D microenvironments. Such advances in biofabrication will expand biosensor utility and availability, with impact realized in many interdisciplinary fields, as well as in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.