Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25612939›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2015

Ophthalmological assessment of cannabis-induced persisting perception disorder: is there a direct retinal effect?

Ditta Zobor, Torsten Strasser, Gergely Zobor, Franziska Schober, Andre Messias, Olaf Strauss, Anil Batra, Eberhart Zrenner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis of clinical electro-oculography values.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ditta ZoborInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany, ditta.zobor@uni-tuebingen.de.
Torsten Strasser
Gergely Zobor
Franziska Schober
Andre Messias
Olaf Strauss
Anil Batra
Eberhart Zrenner
University of Tübingen · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCannabis is a psychotomimetic agent that induces impairment of sensory perception. We present detailed clinical and electrophysiological data of patients with hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD) after marijuana consumption.

methodsA HPPD patient and four heavy cannabis smokers with no visual disturbances (controls) underwent complete ophthalmological examination including psychophysical tests (visual acuity, color vision, visual field, and dark adaptation) and detailed electrophysiological examinations, including extended Ganzfeld ERG, multifocal ERG, and electrooculography (EOG). Furthermore, electrically evoked phosphene thresholds (EPTs) were measured to further evaluate retinal function.

resultsOphthalmological and most electrophysiological examinations were within normal limits for the HPPD patient and for all control subjects. Interestingly, EOG results of the HPPD patient showed a slightly reduced fast oscillation ratio, diminished standing potentials of the slow oscillations, and a light peak within normal range resulting in higher Arden ratios. The EPTs of the patient were reduced, in particular for pulses with long durations (50 ms) causing visual sensations even at lowest possible currents of the neurostimulator. The control subjects did not reveal such alterations.

conclusionsOur findings suggest a direct effect of cannabinoids on the retina and retinal pigment epithelium function, which may be involved in disturbances of the visual function experienced after drug consumption. The observations presented here may contribute to the elucidation of the detailed mechanism. Furthermore, EOG and EPT measurements may be useful tools to demonstrate long-term retinal alterations in cannabis-induced HPPD in patients.

Indexed as

AdultCannabisDark AdaptationElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPerceptual DisordersRetinaRetinal Pigment EpitheliumVision DisordersVisual AcuityVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25612939
OpenAlexW2073584656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.