Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616508›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2015

Fracture incidence in a large cohort of men age 30 years and older with osteoporosis.

A D Manthripragada, C D O'Malley, U Gruntmanis, J W Hall, R B Wagman, P D Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of major osteoporotic fracture to hip fracture incidence rate ratios worldwide: implications for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-derived estimates.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. The epidemiology of wrist fractures in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  6. Time to Osteoporosis and Major Fracture in Older Men: The MrOS Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A D ManthripragadaAmgen Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA, awahnerm@amgen.com.
C D O'Malley
U Gruntmanis
J W Hall
R B Wagman
P D Miller
Amgen (United States) · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn this large retrospective study of men with presumed osteoporosis, we estimate the rate of osteoporosis-related fractures in men age ≥30 years. Our results suggest that spine and hip fractures continue to be a considerable disease burden for osteoporotic men of all ages.

introductionThe purposes of this study were to describe a cohort of men with presumed osteoporosis and estimate the incidence rates of fractures by age.

methodsUsing US administrative claims data, we identified 43,813 men ≥30 years old with an osteoporosis diagnosis or use of an osteoporosis medication. Men were followed for a minimum of 12 months after diagnosis or treatment of osteoporosis (index date), until the earliest of fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, distal femur, humerus, wrist, forearm), disenrollment, or study end date.

resultsDuring the study period, there were 3834 first fractures following the index date and 3303 fractures in the 6-month period prior to the diagnosis/treatment of osteoporosis. Incidence rates of osteoporosis-related fracture, estimated from the index date onward, increased with age, although did not significantly differ from one another in younger age groups (30-49 and 50-64 years). Spine fractures had the highest incidence rate in men across all age groups, increasing from 10.8 per 100,000 person-years (p-yrs) (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1, 12.7), 12.2 per 100,000 p-yrs (95% CI 11.2, 13.3), and 15.3 per 100,000 p-yrs (95% CI 13.8, 16.9) in men 30-49, 50-64, and 65-74 years to 33.4 per 100,000 p-yrs (95% CI 31.5, 35.4) in men ≥75 years. Hip fractures were the second most common, with the incidence rate reaching 16.2 per 100,000 (95% CI 14.9, 17.6) in the ≥75-year group.

conclusionThese incidence rates suggest that spine and hip fractures are a considerable disease burden for men of all ages diagnosed and/or treated for osteoporosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionCohort StudiesComorbidityHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25616508
OpenAlexW1986118353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.