Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25616812›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2015

Decision making, central coherence and set-shifting: a comparison between Binge Eating Disorder, Anorexia Nervosa and Healthy Controls.

Matteo Aloi, Marianna Rania, Mariarita Caroleo, Antonella Bruni, Antonella Palmieri, Maria Antonella Cauteruccio, Pasquale De Fazio, Cristina Segura-García

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impulsivity and compulsivity in binge eating disorder: A systematic review of behavioral studies.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Examining the Effects of Ostracism and Overinclusion in the Eating Disorder Binge Spectrum: Evidence From a Controlled Cyberball Task.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association of executive function problems and disordered eating behaviours in teens with type 1 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matteo AloiChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. matteo.aloi@hotmail.it.
Marianna RaniaChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. marianna.rania@hotmail.it.
Mariarita CaroleoChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. mariaritacaroleo.82@gmail.com.
Antonella BruniChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. bruni_antonella@yahoo.it.
Antonella PalmieriChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. anto.palm@hotmail.it.
Maria Antonella CauteruccioDepartment of Education of Calabria Region, Catanzaro, Italy. m.cauteruccio@regcal.it.
Pasquale De FazioChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. defazio@unicz.it.
Cristina Segura-GarcíaChair of Psychiatry. Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. segura@unicz.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have investigated the cognitive profile in patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN); on the contrary few studies have evaluated it in patients with Binge Eating Disorder (BED). The purpose of this study was to compare decision making, central coherence and set-shifting between BED and AN patients.

methodsA battery of neuropsychological tests including the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Trial Making Task (TMT) and the Hayling Sentence Completion Task (HSCT) were administered in a sample of 135 women (45 AN, 45 BED, 45 Healthy Controls [HC]). Furthermore, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was administered to evaluate depressive symptoms. Years of education, age, Body Mass Index (BMI) and depression severity were considered as covariates in statistical analyses.

resultsBED and AN patients showed high rates of cognitive impairment compared to HC on the domains investigated; furthermore, the cognitive profile of BED patients was characterised by poorer decision making and cognitive flexibility compared to patients with AN. Cognitive performance was strongly associated with depressive symptoms.

conclusionsIn the present sample, two different neurocognitive profiles emerged: a strong cognitive rigidity and a central coherence based on the details was predominant in patients with AN, while a lack of attention and difficulty in adapting to changes in a new situation seemed to better describe patients with BED. The knowledge of the different cognitive profiles of EDs patients may be important for the planning their psychotherapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSense of CoherenceSet, PsychologyAdultAnorexia NervosaBinge-Eating DisorderFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25616812
PMCPMC4308856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.