Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25627928›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2015

Adaptive evolution of formyl peptide receptors in mammals.

Yoshinori Muto, Stéphane Guindon, Toshiaki Umemura, László Kőhidai, Hiroshi Ueda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Caulerpin MitigatesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative genomic analyses illuminate the distinct evolution of megabats within Chiroptera.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020
    Article
  10. TheNeural regeneration research · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Formyl peptide receptor 2 regulates monocyte recruitment to promote intestinal mucosal wound repair.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Large Scale Analyses and Visualization of Adaptive Amino Acid Changes Projects.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Formyl-peptide receptor 2 governs leukocyte influx in localFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Molecular Evolution of the TET Gene Family in Mammals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yoshinori MutoUnited Graduate School of Drug Discovery and Medical Information Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan, ymuto@gifu-u.ac.jp.
Stéphane Guindon
Toshiaki Umemura
László Kőhidai
Hiroshi Ueda
Gifu University · JPSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are a family of chemoattractant receptors with important roles in host defense and the regulation of inflammatory reactions. In humans, three FPR paralogs have been identified (FPR1, FPR2, and FPR3) and may have functionally diversified by gene duplication and adaptive evolution. However, the evolutionary mechanisms operating in the diversification of FPR family genes and the changes in selection pressures have not been characterized to date. Here, we have made a comprehensive evolutionary analysis of FPR genes from mammalian species. Phylogenetic analysis showed that an early duplication was responsible for FPR1 and FPR2/FPR3 splitting, and FPR3 originated from the latest duplication event near the origin of primates. Codon-based tests of positive selection reveal interesting patterns in FPR1 and FPR2 versus FPR3, with the first two genes showing clear evidence of positive selection at some sites while the majority of them evolve under strong negative selection. In contrast, our results suggest that the selective pressure may be relaxed in the FPR3 lineage. Of the six amino acid sites inferred to evolve under positive selection in FPR1 and FPR2, four sites were located in extracellular loops of the protein. The electrostatic potential of the extracellular surface of FPR might be affected more frequently with amino acid substitutions in positively selected sites. Thus, positive selection of FPRs among mammals may reflect a link between changes in the sequence and surface structure of the proteins and is likely to be important in the host's defense against invading pathogens.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsMammalsPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, Formyl PeptideReceptors, Formyl Peptide

Identifiers

PMID25627928
OpenAlexW2167080613

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.