Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25639628›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2015

Identifying Novel Clinical Surrogates to Assess Human Bone Fracture Toughness.

Mathilde Granke, Alexander J Makowski, Sasidhar Uppuganti, Mark D Does, Jeffry S Nyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differences and similarities in cortical bone of the femur between donors with and without type 2 diabetes.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. In Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality Without X-rays.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TNMR in biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathilde GrankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alexander J MakowskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sasidhar UppugantiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mark D DoesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jeffry S NymanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
The Roles of Collagen and Water in the Fracture Resistance of BoneR01AR063157 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI NYMAN, JEFFRY STEPHEN · 2012 to 2025
$3.9M
Bone Fracture Risk Assessment Through Bound - and Pore - Water MRIR01EB014308 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOES, MARK D · 2012 to 2020
$3.2M
Novel ultrahigh resolution microCT imaging systemS10RR027631 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PERRIEN, DANIEL S · 2010 to 2010
$460k
Aging and Diabetes-Related Factors Compromising Bone Fracture ResistanceI01BX001018 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI NYMAN, JEFFRY STEPHEN · 2011 to 2014
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001018NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR027631NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027631NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIAMS NIH HHS AR063157NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063157NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture risk does not solely depend on strength but also on fracture toughness; ie, the ability of bone material to resist crack initiation and propagation. Because resistance to crack growth largely depends on bone properties at the tissue level, including collagen characteristics, current X-ray based assessment tools may not be suitable to identify age-related, disease-related, or treatment-related changes in fracture toughness. To identify useful clinical surrogates that could improve the assessment of fracture resistance, we investigated the potential of (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and reference point indentation (RPI) to explain age-related variance in fracture toughness. Harvested from cadaveric femurs (62 human donors), single-edge notched beam (SENB) specimens of cortical bone underwent fracture toughness testing (R-curve method). NMR-derived bound water showed the strongest correlation with fracture toughness properties (r = 0.63 for crack initiation, r = 0.35 for crack growth, and r = 0.45 for overall fracture toughness; p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses indicated that the age-related decrease in different fracture toughness properties were best explained by a combination of NMR properties including pore water and RPI-derived tissue stiffness with age as a significant covariate (adjusted R(2)  = 53.3%, 23.9%, and 35.2% for crack initiation, crack growth, and overall toughness, respectively; p < 0.001). These findings reflect the existence of many contributors to fracture toughness and emphasize the utility of a multimodal assessment of fracture resistance. Exploring the mechanistic origin of fracture toughness, glycation-mediated nonenzymatic collagen crosslinks and intracortical porosity are possible determinants of bone fracture toughness and could explain the sensitivity of NMR to changes in fracture toughness. Assuming fracture toughness is clinically important to the ability of bone to resist fracture, our results suggest that improvements in fracture risk assessment could potentially be achieved by accounting for water distribution (quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging) and by a local measure of tissue resistance to indentation, RPI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkersBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisX-Ray MicrotomographyYoung AdultBiomarkersBOUND WATERFRACTURE TOUGHNESSHUMAN CORTICAL BONENON-ENZYMATIC COLLAGEN CROSSLINKSNUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCEPOROSITYREFERENCE POINT INDENTATION

Identifiers

PMID25639628
PMCPMC4478129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.