SynthesisEndocrine2015
Association between rs7903146 and rs12255372 polymorphisms of transcription factor 7-like 2 gene and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of TCF7L2 genetic variants rs12255372 and rs7903146 with the polycystic ovary syndrome risk: systemic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Pooled it
- Association of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) 4a/b polymorphism with the risk of incident diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Family history of menstrual irregularity or diabetes mellitus enhances the susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome among subjects harboring rs7903146 genetic variant ofJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022Article
- The Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview of Candidate Gene Systematic Reviews and Genome-Wide Association Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies examines the associations between rs7903146 and rs12255372 polymorphisms of the TCF7L2 gene and PCOS. A search of the literature published until August 2014 was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and LILACS. There were no other limits except for the end date. We included observational studies with women of any age diagnosed with PCOS and healthy controls that analyzed polymorphisms rs7903146 and rs12255372. We included case-control or cross-sectional studies analyzing polymorphism rs7903146 or rs12255372 in women with PCOS and healthy controls. Eighteen studies were identified after the primary literature search and seven articles were included in the meta-analysis. All employed Rotterdam criteria for the diagnosis of PCOS. The genotypic distributions in the control groups were in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in all studies. The pooled population included Asian descendents (Chinese, Korean), Caucasians from southern Brazil, Tunisian, and European populations (British/Irish, Northern Finns, Greeks, Czechs), including 1,892 women with PCOS and 2,695 controls. There were no significant associations between PCOS and TCF7L2 rs7903146 or rs12255372 polymorphisms, irrespective of whether allele contrast, additive, dominant, or recessive models of inheritance were used. Furthermore, no significant associations were found after stratification for ethnicity (Asian or non-Asian). There was no significant heterogeneity between studies and no publication bias. The present results suggest that rs7903146 T allele or rs12255372 is not associated with risk for PCOS in non-Asian or Asian women. This systematic review and meta-analysis are registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42013005930.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.