Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25694124›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2015

Core principles of bacterial autoinducer systems.

Burkhard A Hense, Martin Schuster

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacilli the most important biocontrol agent in Brazilian agriculture: from mechanisms of action to market adoption.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Alternatives and Next-Generation Therapeutics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical Conversations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Soybean-mediated suppression of BjaI/BjaRApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Burkhard A HenseInstitute for Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg/Munich, Germany burkhard.hense@helmholtz-muenchen.de martin.schuster@oregonstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5848-7227
Martin SchusterDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA burkhard.hense@helmholtz-muenchen.de martin.schuster@oregonstate.edu.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryAutoinduction (AI), the response to self-produced chemical signals, is widespread in the bacterial world. This process controls vastly different target functions, such as luminescence, nutrient acquisition, and biofilm formation, in different ways and integrates additional environmental and physiological cues. This diversity raises questions about unifying principles that underlie all AI systems. Here, we suggest that such core principles exist. We argue that the general purpose of AI systems is the homeostatic control of costly cooperative behaviors, including, but not limited to, secreted public goods. First, costly behaviors require preassessment of their efficiency by cheaper AI signals, which we encapsulate in a hybrid "push-pull" model. The "push" factors cell density, diffusion, and spatial clustering determine when a behavior becomes effective. The relative importance of each factor depends on each species' individual ecological context and life history. In turn, "pull" factors, often stress cues that reduce the activation threshold, determine the cellular demand for the target behavior. Second, control is homeostatic because AI systems, either themselves or through accessory mechanisms, not only initiate but also maintain the efficiency of target behaviors. Third, AI-controlled behaviors, even seemingly noncooperative ones, are generally cooperative in nature, when interpreted in the appropriate ecological context. The escape of individual cells from biofilms, for example, may be viewed as an altruistic behavior that increases the fitness of the resident population by reducing starvation stress. The framework proposed here helps appropriately categorize AI-controlled behaviors and allows for a deeper understanding of their ecological and evolutionary functions.

Indexed as

Quorum Sensing4-ButyrolactoneBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsHomeostasisMicrobial InteractionsModels, BiologicalOligopeptidesSignal Transduction4-ButyrolactoneBacterial Proteinshomoserine lactoneOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID25694124
PMCPMC4402962
OpenAlexW1994426944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.