Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25697718›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2015

Escaping the Hemoglobin A1c-Centric World in Evaluating Diabetes Mellitus Interventions.

Robert A Vigersky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Time in range and HbAPediatric diabetes · 2020
    Article
  6. Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Implications for Use of Continuous Data in Daily Diabetes Management.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  7. Using Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Practice.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert A VigerskyDiabetes Institute of the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA Robert.a.vigersky.mil@mail.mil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any intervention in patients with diabetes must consider its effect on both the incidence of hypoglycemia and hemoglobin A1c. Yet, there is no single metric that expresses these key factors simultaneously. Such a composite metric would permit clinicians, regulators, manufacturers, payers, and researchers to more easily evaluate the merits of an intervention as well as enable the comparison of qualitatively different interventions. This article proposes a composite metric, the hypoglycemia-A1c score (HAS), as the basis for a more comprehensive approach for the stakeholders in diabetes treatment to better understand how an intervention affects diabetes management. The article also demonstrates how additional parameters such as effects on weight, quality of life, and costs could be included in such a scoring system.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulindiabetes mellitusglycemic controlhemoglobin A1chypoglycemia

Identifiers

PMID25697718
PMCPMC4667353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.