Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25708497›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2015

Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: obstacles and solutions.

Daisuke Sakai, Gunnar B J Andersson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03002207 (A Prospective, Comparative Study to Evaluate Effectiveness of Repairing the Defect of Intervertebral Disc With Autologous BMSC and Gelatin Sponge After Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation), which is not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
27.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03002207 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Comparative Study to Evaluate Effectiveness of Repairing the Defect of Intervertebral Disc With Autologous BMSC and Gelatin Sponge After Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhanghaoRan2016 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsLumbar Disc HerniationArmsAutologous Bone Marrow Stem Cell (BMSC)/gelatin sponge, The defect is sutured
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 463 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem cells and discogenic back pain.British medical bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. MnOMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ISSLS Presidential Address 2026: Building Bridges Across Generations, Continents, and Spine Science.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.
Gunnar B J AnderssonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is frequently associated with low back and neck pain, which accounts for disability worldwide. Despite the known outcomes of the IVD degeneration cascade, the treatment of IVD degeneration is limited in that available conservative and surgical treatments do not reverse the pathology or restore the IVD tissue. Regenerative medicine for IVD degeneration, by injection of IVD cells, chondrocytes or stem cells, has been extensively studied in the past decade in various animal models of induced IVD degeneration, and has progressed to clinical trials in the treatment of various spinal conditions. Despite preliminary results showing positive effects of cell-injection strategies for IVD regeneration, detailed basic research on IVD cells and their niche indicates that transplanted cells are unable to survive and adapt in the avascular niche of the IVD. For this therapeutic strategy to succeed, the indications for its use and the patients who would benefit need to be better defined. To surmount these obstacles, the solution will be identified only by focused research, both in the laboratory and in the clinic.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsChondrocytesClinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationRegenerative MedicineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25708497
OpenAlexW2050475565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.