ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015
SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T).
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary practice guidelines for the diagnosis, genetic counseling and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Guideline
- Succinate Dehydrogenase Complex Iron Sulfur Subunit B (SDHB) Immunohistochemistry in Pheochromocytoma, Head and Neck Paraganglioma, Thoraco-Abdomino-Pelvic Paragangliomas: Is It a Good Idea to Use in Routine Work?Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Pooled it
- Immunohistochemistry and Mutation Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Trial
- Validation structures for sequence variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Double faces of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma-a review of integrated pathologic diagnosis.Endocrine journal · 2026Review
- From Tissue Architecture To Genetic Signature: Artificial intelligence-based Analysis of Reticulin Framework and Clinical Variables Predicts Molecular Cluster in Paragangliomas.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Functional characterization of SDHB variants: Advancing succinate dehydrogenase biology and variant curation in hereditary paraganglioma.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- The evolving roles of pathologists in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Clinical significance, prognosis, and risk model of SDHB expression loss and ERBB2 expression in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- Article
- Postnatal sustentacular cells as chromaffin progenitors and tumor cells of origin in VHL-related paragangliomas.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- In vivo and in vitro analysis of functional effects of the SDHD H50R variant.Endocrine-related cancer · 2025Article
- Paraganglioma in Pregnancy with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Case Report.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2025Article
- Metastatic Malignant Paraganglioma of Rare Sites Failed on Conventional Treatments Demonstrating Beneficial Response toWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- The road ahead: a brief guide to navigating the 2022 WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours.Journal of clinical pathology · 2024Review
- A Novel Human SDHA-Knockout Cell Line Model for the Functional Analysis of Clinically Relevant SDHA Variants.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Non-Susceptibility Gene Variants in Head and Neck Paragangliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Differential expression of nuclear-derived mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase genes in metabolically active buffalo tissues.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- SDHA-related phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: review and clinical management.Endocrine-related cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Tympanomastoid Paragangliomas: A Report from Slovenia.Cancers · 2024Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the established role of SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry as a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for familial succinate dehydrogenase-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes, the reproducibility of the assessment methods has not as yet been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver variability among seven expert endocrine pathologists using a web-based virtual microscopy approach in a large multicenter pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma cohort (n=351): (1) 73 SDH mutated, (2) 105 non-SDH mutated, (3) 128 samples without identified SDH-x mutations, and (4) 45 with incomplete SDH molecular genetic analysis. Substantial agreement among all the reviewers was observed either with a two-tiered classification (SDHB κ=0.7338; SDHA κ=0.6707) or a three-tiered classification approach (SDHB κ=0.6543; SDHA κ=0.7516). Consensus was achieved in 315 cases (89.74%) for SDHB immunohistochemistry and in 348 cases (99.15%) for SDHA immunohistochemistry. Among the concordant cases, 62 of 69 (~90%) SDHB-/C-/D-/AF2-mutated cases displayed SDHB immunonegativity and SDHA immunopositivity, 3 of 4 (75%) with SDHA mutations showed loss of SDHA/SDHB protein expression, whereas 98 of 105 (93%) non-SDH-x-mutated counterparts demonstrated retention of SDHA/SDHB protein expression. Two SDHD-mutated extra-adrenal paragangliomas were scored as SDHB immunopositive, whereas 9 of 128 (7%) tumors without identified SDH-x mutations, 6 of 37 (~16%) VHL-mutated, as well as 1 of 21 (~5%) NF1-mutated tumors were evaluated as SDHB immunonegative. Although 14 out of those 16 SDHB-immunonegative cases were nonmetastatic, an overall significant correlation between SDHB immunonegativity and malignancy was observed (P=0.00019). We conclude that SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry is a reliable tool to identify patients with SDH-x mutations with an additional value in the assessment of genetic variants of unknown significance. If SDH molecular genetic analysis fails to detect a mutation in SDHB-immunonegative tumor, SDHC promoter methylation and/or VHL/NF1 testing with the use of targeted next-generation sequencing is advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.