SynthesisLancet (London, England)2015
Genetic risk, coronary heart disease events, and the clinical benefit of statin therapy: an analysis of primary and secondary prevention trials.
Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 335 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Follow-up Strategy Based on a New Remote Contactless Sleep Monitoring System on Secondary Prevention in Patients Received Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery
Prospective Electronic Polygenic Risk Study (PEPRS) - First Phase
Prospective Electronic Polygenic Risk Study - Second Phase
The Electronic Medical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network Genomic Risk Assessment
Polygenic Risk Score to Optimize Primary Prevention in Intermediate Risk Population (PERSONAL)
Who cites it
335 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Genome-wide association study of idiopathic epilepsy in the Italian Spinone dog breed.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Polygenic Risk Score and Statin Relative Risk Reduction for Primary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in a Real-World Population.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- A polygenic risk score improves risk stratification of coronary artery disease: a large-scale prospective Chinese cohort study.European heart journal · 2022Pooled it
- Smoking Status and Type 2 Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of Shared Genetic Etiology and Causal Relationship.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- The role of blood CXCL12 level in prognosis of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Polygenic risk, aspirin, and primary prevention of coronary artery disease.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Trial
- Pharmacogenomics polygenic risk score for drug response prediction using PRS-PGx methods.Nature communications · 2022Trial
- Common genetic variants do not predict recurrent events in coronary heart disease patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Trial
- The Statin Floor Effect: a Mechanistic Framework for Residual Cardiovascular Risk.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Using a translational data platform to create clinical-grade genome-informed risk assessments.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Inherited risk of coronary artery disease: redefining care with imaging and genetics.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Polygenic Prediction of Nongoal Response to Statin Therapy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Translating genome-wide association studies at multiple scales: Drug target prioritization, cellular architectures, and organ imaging.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Association of rs4977574 with Lipid Phenotypes, Smoking Status, and Statin Exposure in a Saudi Cardiovascular Cohort: A Sensitivity-Adjusted Genetic Association Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Polygenic Risk Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in East Asian Populations.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Denture use is associated with a higher risk of cholelithiasis: a prospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Atherosclerotic Plaque: Pathophysiological Background and Therapeutic Perspectives.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
275 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic variants have been associated with the risk of coronary heart disease. In this study, we tested whether or not a composite of these variants could ascertain the risk of both incident and recurrent coronary heart disease events and identify those individuals who derive greater clinical benefit from statin therapy.
methodsA community-based cohort study (the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study) and four randomised controlled trials of both primary prevention (JUPITER and ASCOT) and secondary prevention (CARE and PROVE IT-TIMI 22) with statin therapy, comprising a total of 48,421 individuals and 3477 events, were included in these analyses. We studied the association of a genetic risk score based on 27 genetic variants with incident or recurrent coronary heart disease, adjusting for traditional clinical risk factors. We then investigated the relative and absolute risk reductions in coronary heart disease events with statin therapy stratified by genetic risk. We combined data from the different studies using a meta-analysis.
findingsWhen individuals were divided into low (quintile 1), intermediate (quintiles 2-4), and high (quintile 5) genetic risk categories, a significant gradient in risk for incident or recurrent coronary heart disease was shown. Compared with the low genetic risk category, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for coronary heart disease for the intermediate genetic risk category was 1·34 (95% CI 1·22-1·47, p<0·0001) and that for the high genetic risk category was 1·72 (1·55-1·92, p<0·0001). In terms of the benefit of statin therapy in the four randomised trials, we noted a significant gradient (p=0·0277) of increasing relative risk reductions across the low (13%), intermediate (29%), and high (48%) genetic risk categories. Similarly, we noted greater absolute risk reductions in those individuals in higher genetic risk categories (p=0·0101), resulting in a roughly threefold decrease in the number needed to treat to prevent one coronary heart disease event in the primary prevention trials. Specifically, in the primary prevention trials, the number needed to treat to prevent one such event in 10 years was 66 in people at low genetic risk, 42 in those at intermediate genetic risk, and 25 in those at high genetic risk in JUPITER, and 57, 47, and 20, respectively, in ASCOT.
interpretationA genetic risk score identified individuals at increased risk for both incident and recurrent coronary heart disease events. People with the highest burden of genetic risk derived the largest relative and absolute clinical benefit from statin therapy.
fundingNational Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.