ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2015
Do we really know the CvLPRIT in Myocardial infarction? or just stent all lesions?
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multivessel vs. Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- FFR-guided multivessel stenting reduces urgent revascularization compared with infarct-related artery only stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Complete versus culprit only revascularization in young STEMI patients with multivessel disease.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026Article
- Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2017Review
- Complete versus culprit only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a perspective on recent trials and recommendations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25766942What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.