ReviewDiabetes technology & therapeutics2015
An Overview of Current Regulatory Requirements for Approval of Biosimilar Insulins.
Review in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Similar Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Biosimilar SAR342434 Insulin Lispro and Japan-Approved Humalog Insulin Lispro in Healthy Japanese Subjects.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2022Trial
- Re-engineering insulin for oral delivery: structural modifications, advanced formulation strategies, and future directions.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Regulatory Definitions and Classification of Biosimilar Medications Across the 6 Regions of the World Health Organization: A Scoping Review.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Understanding Biosimilar Insulins - Development, Manufacturing, and Clinical Trials.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Review
- Current Trends and Changes in Use of Membrane Molecular Dynamics Simulations within Academia and the Pharmaceutical Industry.Membranes · 2023Review
- Biosimilars in Oncology: Latest Trends and Regulatory Status.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Review
- Review of biologics, biosimilars, and intended copies in rheumatology, and current practice in Iraq.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2019Review
- Global Acceptance of Biosimilars: Importance of Regulatory Consistency, Education, and Trust.The oncologist · 2018Review
- Production costs and potential prices for biosimilars of human insulin and insulin analogues.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Article
- Biosimilar insulins: guidance for data interpretation by clinicians and users.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2015Review
- Analytical and Biological Characterization of a Noninnovator Insulin Glargine and the Originator Drug Product.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Article
- Biosimilar Insulin and Costs: What Can We Expect?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insulin analog patent expiry is likely to mean that, increasingly, copies of original biopharmaceutical products will be submitted for authorization. Experience with biosimilars in other therapeutic areas suggests that careful regulation and caution are needed. Published guidelines of regulatory authorities around the world on approval of biosimilars and, where available, insulin biosimilars were reviewed. Information was sourced through Internet searching and cross-referencing guidelines. As of August 2014, general biosimilar and insulin-specific guidelines are available in 34 countries and two countries/regulatory domains, respectively. Many guidelines are clearly related to, or partly derived from, the general and insulin-specific European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. Areas covered by these guidelines are fairly consistent, covering preclinical, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies in humans and clinical areas; however, there are differences in emphasis. The EMA insulin-specific guidelines include detailed criteria on PK/PD studies, as do most other general biosimilar guidelines and, to a lesser extent, clinical studies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has general biosimilar guidelines, emphasizing consideration of the whole package of in vitro, biological, and human studies, rather than concentrating on any one aspect. In countries such as Mexico, guidelines are broad, leaving wide discretion to the regulatory authority. In conclusion, from a global perspective, this area of drug regulation is heterogeneous and evolving, and the authors call for an initiative aimed at harmonizing the requirements for biosimilar insulins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.