Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25790761›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2016

Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation affects pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Maryam Karamali, Zatollah Asemi, Maedeh Ahmadi-Dastjerdi, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

RetractedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam Karamali1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,School of Medicine,Arak University of Medical Sciences,Arak,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Zatollah Asemi2Department of Nutrition,Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases,Kashan University of Medical Sciences,Kashan,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Maedeh Ahmadi-Dastjerdi1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,School of Medicine,Arak University of Medical Sciences,Arak,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Ahmad Esmaillzadeh3Food Security Research Center,Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,Isfahan,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Arak University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRKashan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was designed to assess the effects of Ca+vitamin D supplementation on pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

designA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among sixty women with GDM. Participants were divided into two groups to receive Ca+vitamin D supplements or placebo. Individuals in the Ca+vitamin D group (n 30) received 1000 mg Ca/d and two pearls containing 1250 µg (50 000 IU) of cholecalciferol (vitamin D(3)) during the intervention (one at study baseline and another at day 21 of the intervention); those in the placebo group (n 30) received two placebos of vitamin D at the mentioned times and placebos of Ca every day for 6 weeks. Pregnancy outcomes were determined.

settingA urban community setting in Arak, Iran. SUBJECTS: Sixty women with GDM and their newborns, living in Arak, Iran were enrolled.

resultsWomen treated with Ca+vitamin D had a significant decrease in caesarean section rate (23·3 % v. 63·3 %, P=0·002) and maternal hospitalization (0 v. 13·3 %, P=0·03) compared with those receiving placebo. In addition, newborns of GDM women randomized to Ca+vitamin D had no case of macrosomia, while the prevalence of macrosomia among those randomized to placebo was 13·3 % (P=0·03). Lower rates of hyperbilirubinaemia (20·0 % v. 56·7 %, P=0·03) and hospitalization (20·0 % v. 56·7 %, P=0·03) were also seen in the supplemented group of newborns than in the placebo group.

conclusionsCa+vitamin D supplementation for 6 weeks among pregnant women with GDM led to decreased caesarean section rate and maternal hospitalization, and decreased macrosomia, hyperbilirubinaemia and hospitalization in newborns.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBody WeightCalcium, DietaryCesarean SectionCholecalciferolDiabetes, GestationalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFetal MacrosomiaFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationBlood GlucoseCalcium, DietaryCholecalciferolVitamin DCalciumGestational diabetes mellitusPregnancy outcomesSupplementationVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25790761
PMCPMC10271001
OpenAlexW2159769562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.