Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25793381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Mid-embryo patterning and precision in Drosophila segmentation: Krüppel dual regulation of hunchback.

David M Holloway, Alexander V Spirov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M HollowayMathematics Department, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Burnaby, B.C., V5G 3H2, Canada.
Alexander V SpirovComputer Science, and Center of Excellence in Wireless and Information Technology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America; The Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

Understanding Robust Development: Experiment and TheoryR01GM072022 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SPIROV, ALEXANDER V · 2004 to 2014
$2.7M
Understanding Embryonic Robustness: Quantitative Experiments and TheoryR56GM072022 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SPIROV, ALEXANDER V · 2009 to 2009
$312k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072022NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM072022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early development, genes are expressed in spatial patterns which later define cellular identities and tissue locations. The mechanisms of such pattern formation have been studied extensively in early Drosophila (fruit fly) embryos. The gap gene hunchback (hb) is one of the earliest genes to be expressed in anterior-posterior (AP) body segmentation. As a transcriptional regulator for a number of downstream genes, the spatial precision of hb expression can have significant effects in the development of the body plan. To investigate the factors contributing to hb precision, we used fine spatial and temporal resolution data to develop a quantitative model for the regulation of hb expression in the mid-embryo. In particular, modelling hb pattern refinement in mid nuclear cleavage cycle 14 (NC14) reveals some of the regulatory contributions of simultaneously-expressed gap genes. Matching the model to recent data from wild-type (WT) embryos and mutants of the gap gene Krüppel (Kr) indicates that a mid-embryo Hb concentration peak important in thoracic development (at parasegment 4, PS4) is regulated in a dual manner by Kr, with low Kr concentration activating hb and high Kr concentration repressing hb. The processes of gene expression (transcription, translation, transport) are intrinsically random. We used stochastic simulations to characterize the noise generated in hb expression. We find that Kr regulation can limit the positional variability of the Hb mid-embryo border. This has been recently corroborated in experimental comparisons of WT and Kr- mutant embryos. Further, Kr regulation can decrease uncertainty in mid-embryo hb expression (i.e. contribute to a smooth Hb boundary) and decrease between-copy transcriptional variability within nuclei. Since many tissue boundaries are first established by interactions between neighbouring gene expression domains, these properties of Hb-Kr dynamics to diminish the effects of intrinsic expression noise may represent a general mechanism contributing to robustness in early development.

Indexed as

Body PatterningAnimalsCell NucleusDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsModels, BiologicalProtein BindingStochastic ProcessesTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinshb protein, DrosophilaKr protein, DrosophilaKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25793381
PMCPMC4368514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.