ArticleDevelopmental biology2015
An in vivo screen to identify candidate neurogenic genes in the developing Xenopus visual system.
Article in Developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- An in-depth review of the function of RNA-binding protein FXR1 in neurodevelopment.Cell and tissue research · 2024Review
- BRCA1 and ELK-1 regulate neural progenitor cell fate in the optic tectum in response to visual experience inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- GID complex regulates the differentiation of neural stem cells by destabilizing TET2.Frontiers of medicine · 2023Article
- Expression and cilia associated localization of Histone deacetylases 6 inmicroPublication biology · 2023Article
- Imaging Structural and Functional Dynamics inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2022Article
- Temporal and spatial transcriptomic dynamics across brain development in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- TRA2A-induced upregulation of LINC00662 regulates blood-brain barrier permeability by affecting ELK4 mRNA stability in Alzheimer's microenvironment.RNA biology · 2020Article
- Experience-Dependent Development of Dendritic Arbors in Mouse Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Nutrient restriction causes reversible G2 arrest inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019Article
- Genetic Control of Expression and Splicing in Developing Human Brain Informs Disease Mechanisms.Cell · 2019Article
- Neural architecture: from cells to circuits.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Review
- Article
- An optimized method for cryogenic storage of Xenopus sperm to maximise the effectiveness of research using genetically altered frogs.Theriogenology · 2017Article
- Thyroid Hormone Acts Locally to Increase Neurogenesis, Neuronal Differentiation, and Dendritic Arbor Elaboration in the Tadpole Visual System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Using Xenopus laevis retinal and spinal neurons to study mechanisms of axon guidance in vivo and in vitro.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neurogenesis in the brain of Xenopus laevis continues throughout larval stages of development. We developed a 2-tier screen to identify candidate genes controlling neurogenesis in Xenopus optic tectum in vivo. First, microarray and NanoString analyses were used to identify candidate genes that were differentially expressed in Sox2-expressing neural progenitor cells or their neuronal progeny. Then an in vivo, time-lapse imaging-based screen was used to test whether morpholinos against 34 candidate genes altered neural progenitor cell proliferation or neuronal differentiation over 3 days in the optic tectum of intact Xenopus tadpoles. We co-electroporated antisense morpholino oligonucleotides against each of the candidate genes with a plasmid that drives GFP expression in Sox2-expressing neural progenitor cells and quantified the effects of morpholinos on neurogenesis. Of the 34 morpholinos tested, 24 altered neural progenitor cell proliferation or neuronal differentiation. The candidates which were tagged as differentially expressed and validated by the in vivo imaging screen include: actn1, arl9, eif3a, elk4, ephb1, fmr1-a, fxr1-1, fbxw7, fgf2, gstp1, hat1, hspa5, lsm6, mecp2, mmp9, and prkaca. Several of these candidates, including fgf2 and elk4, have known or proposed neurogenic functions, thereby validating our strategy to identify candidates. Genes with no previously demonstrated neurogenic functions, gstp1, hspa5 and lsm6, were identified from the morpholino experiments, suggesting that our screen successfully revealed unknown candidates. Genes that are associated with human disease, such as such as mecp2 and fmr1-a, were identified by our screen, providing the groundwork for using Xenopus as an experimental system to probe conserved disease mechanisms. Together the data identify candidate neurogenic regulatory genes and demonstrate that Xenopus is an effective experimental animal to identify and characterize genes that regulate neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.