Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25818835›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2015

An in vivo screen to identify candidate neurogenic genes in the developing Xenopus visual system.

Jennifer E Bestman, Lin-Chien Huang, Jane Lee-Osbourne, Phillip Cheung, Hollis T Cline

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. BRCA1 and ELK-1 regulate neural progenitor cell fate in the optic tectum in response to visual experience inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imaging Structural and Functional Dynamics inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experience-Dependent Development of Dendritic Arbors in Mouse Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Nutrient restriction causes reversible G2 arrest inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural architecture: from cells to circuits.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. eNeuro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E BestmanDrug Discovery & Biomedical Sciences, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Lin-Chien HuangThe Dorris Neuroscience Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.
Jane Lee-OsbourneUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
Phillip CheungDart Neuroscience, LLC, San Diego, CA 92064, United States.
Hollis T ClineThe Dorris Neuroscience Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States. Electronic address: cline@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · USDart NeuroScience (United States) · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Activity-dependent Development of Visual System DevelopmentR01EY011261 · NEI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CLINE, HOLLIS T. · 1996 to 2018
$11.1M
Transcriptome Analysis of Identified Cells in Developing Xenopus laevis CNSR01NS076006 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CLINE, HOLLIS T. · 2011 to 2013
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY011261NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011261NINDS NIH HHS NS076006NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogenesis in the brain of Xenopus laevis continues throughout larval stages of development. We developed a 2-tier screen to identify candidate genes controlling neurogenesis in Xenopus optic tectum in vivo. First, microarray and NanoString analyses were used to identify candidate genes that were differentially expressed in Sox2-expressing neural progenitor cells or their neuronal progeny. Then an in vivo, time-lapse imaging-based screen was used to test whether morpholinos against 34 candidate genes altered neural progenitor cell proliferation or neuronal differentiation over 3 days in the optic tectum of intact Xenopus tadpoles. We co-electroporated antisense morpholino oligonucleotides against each of the candidate genes with a plasmid that drives GFP expression in Sox2-expressing neural progenitor cells and quantified the effects of morpholinos on neurogenesis. Of the 34 morpholinos tested, 24 altered neural progenitor cell proliferation or neuronal differentiation. The candidates which were tagged as differentially expressed and validated by the in vivo imaging screen include: actn1, arl9, eif3a, elk4, ephb1, fmr1-a, fxr1-1, fbxw7, fgf2, gstp1, hat1, hspa5, lsm6, mecp2, mmp9, and prkaca. Several of these candidates, including fgf2 and elk4, have known or proposed neurogenic functions, thereby validating our strategy to identify candidates. Genes with no previously demonstrated neurogenic functions, gstp1, hspa5 and lsm6, were identified from the morpholino experiments, suggesting that our screen successfully revealed unknown candidates. Genes that are associated with human disease, such as such as mecp2 and fmr1-a, were identified by our screen, providing the groundwork for using Xenopus as an experimental system to probe conserved disease mechanisms. Together the data identify candidate neurogenic regulatory genes and demonstrate that Xenopus is an effective experimental animal to identify and characterize genes that regulate neural progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationComputational BiologyEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGene Knockdown TechniquesGenetic TestingHumansModels, AnimalModels, NeurologicalMorpholinosNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHSPA5 protein, humanMorpholinosCandidate geneDifferentiationIn vivo imagingMicroarrayMorpholinoNeural progenitor cellNeurogenesisProliferationRadial glia

Identifiers

PMID25818835
PMCPMC4584193
OpenAlexW2004206031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.