Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25849576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sex differences in liver toxicity-do female and male human primary hepatocytes react differently to toxicants in vitro?

Milena Mennecozzi, Brigitte Landesmann, Taina Palosaari, Georgina Harris, Maurice Whelan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unveiling Urinary Mutagenicity by the Ames Test for Occupational Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. HIVIL: A humanNAM journal · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milena MennecozziInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Brigitte LandesmannInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Taina PalosaariInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Georgina HarrisCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Maurice WhelanInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Joint Research Centre · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing amount of evidence for sex variation in drug efficiency and toxicity profiles. Women are more susceptible than men to acute liver injury from xenobiotics. In general, this is attributed to sex differences at a physiological level as well as differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but neither of these can give a sufficient explanation for the diverse responses to xenobiotics. Existing data are mainly based on animal models and limited data exist on in vitro sex differences relevant to humans. To date, male and female human hepatocytes have not yet been compared in terms of their responses to hepatotoxic drugs. We investigated whether sex-specific differences in acute hepatotoxicity can be observed in vitro by comparing hepatotoxic drug effects in male and female primary human hepatocytes. Significant sex-related differences were found for certain parameters and individual drugs, showing an overall higher sensitivity of female primary hepatocytes to hepatotoxicants. Moreover, our work demonstrated that high content screening is feasible with pooled primary human hepatocytes in suspension.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAcetaminophenAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCaffeineCalciumCell Membrane PermeabilityCells, CulturedCell SurvivalChlorpromazineDiclofenacDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndoplasmic ReticulumFemaleHepatocytesHumansMaleAcetaminophenAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCaffeineCalciumChlorpromazineDiclofenacOmeprazoleVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID25849576
PMCPMC4388670
OpenAlexW2015741566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.