Evidence mapPaperPMID 25861233Full record

ReviewClinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes2015

Health economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice focused review.

Andreas Liebl, Kamlesh Khunti, Domingo Orozco-Beltran, Jean-Francois Yale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus andSouthern medical journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Disease and Economic Burden of Poor Metabolic and Weight Control in Type 2 Diabetes in Spain: A Systematic Literature Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. [The Economic Evaluation of the GLICEMIA 2.0 Study as an Example of a Complex Intervention].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Costs of people with diabetes in relation to average glucose control: an empirical approach controlling for year of onset cohorts.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas LieblDepartment for Internal Medicine, Center for Diabetes and Metabolism, m&i-Fachklinik Bad Heilbrunn, Woernerweg 30, D-83670 Bad Heilbrunn, Germany.
Kamlesh KhuntiLeicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Domingo Orozco-BeltranCathedra of Family Medicine, Clinical Medicine Department, University Miguel Hernandez, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Jean-Francois YaleMcGill Nutrition Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a growing healthcare burden primarily due to long-term complications. Strict glycemic control helps in preventing complications, and early introduction of insulin may be more cost-effective than maintaining patients on multiple oral agents. This is an expert opinion review based on English peer-reviewed articles (2000-2012) to discuss the health economic consequences of T2D treatment intensification. T2D costs are driven by inpatient care for treatment of diabetes complications (40%-60% of total cost), with drug therapy for glycemic control representing 18% of the total cost. Insulin therapy provides the most improved glycemic control and reduction of complications, although hypoglycemia and weight gain may occur. Early treatment intensification with insulin analogs in patients with poor glycemic control appears to be cost-effective and improves clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenesshealthcare economics (operational domain)hyperglycemiahypoglycemiainsulinoral antidiabetic agentstype 2 diabetes (clinical domain)

Identifiers

PMID25861233
PMCPMC4374638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.