ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2015
Novel magnetic resonance imaging end points for physiologic studies in peripheral arterial disease: elegance versus practicality.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02624674 (Multi-spectral Imaging to Assess Wounds in Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-spectral Imaging to Assess Wounds in Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging for peripheral artery disease.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.