Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880419›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Novel genetic matching methods for handling population stratification in genome-wide association studies.

André Lacour, Vitalia Schüller, Dmitriy Drichel, Christine Herold, Frank Jessen, Markus Leber, Wolfgang Maier, Markus M Noethen, Alfredo Ramirez, Tatsiana Vaitsiakhovich and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

André LacourGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. andre.lacour@dzne.de.
Vitalia SchüllerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. schueller@imbie.meb.uni-bonn.de.
Dmitriy DrichelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. dmitriy.drichel@dzne.de.
Christine HeroldGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. christine.herold@dzne.de.
Frank JessenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. frank.jessen@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Markus LeberInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. leber@imbie.uni-bonn.de.
Wolfgang MaierAbteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. wolfgang.maier@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Markus M NoethenInstitut für Humangenetik and Life & Brain Center, Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. markus.noethen@uni-bonn.de.
Alfredo RamirezAbteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. alfredo.ramirez@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Tatsiana VaitsiakhovichInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. vait@imbie.uni-bonn.de.
Tim BeckerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53127, Germany. tim.becker@dzne.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA usually confronted problem in association studies is the occurrence of population stratification. In this work, we propose a novel framework to consider population matchings in the contexts of genome-wide and sequencing association studies. We employ pairwise and groupwise optimal case-control matchings and present an agglomerative hierarchical clustering, both based on a genetic similarity score matrix. In order to ensure that the resulting matches obtained from the matching algorithm capture correctly the population structure, we propose and discuss two stratum validation methods. We also invent a decisive extension to the Cochran-Armitage Trend test to explicitly take into account the particular population structure.

resultsWe assess our framework by simulations of genotype data under the null hypothesis, to affirm that it correctly controls for the type-1 error rate. By a power study we evaluate that structured association testing using our framework displays reasonable power. We compare our result with those obtained from a logistic regression model with principal component covariates. Using the principal components approaches we also find a possible false-positive association to Alzheimer's disease, which is neither supported by our new methods, nor by the results of a most recent large meta analysis or by a mixed model approach.

conclusionsMatching methods provide an alternative handling of confounding due to population stratification for statistical tests for which covariates are hard to model. As a benchmark, we show that our matching framework performs equally well to state of the art models on common variants.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisGenetics, PopulationLogistic ModelsAlzheimer DiseaseCase-Control StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansPopulation Groups

Identifiers

PMID25880419
PMCPMC4367953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.