ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2015
Current status of nuclear cardiology in Japan: Ongoing efforts to improve clinical standards and to establish evidence.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential Application of the Myocardial Scintigraphy Agent [International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Current status and perspectives of nuclear cardiology.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Review
- Article
- The characteristics of Japanese guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis compared with the previous guidelines.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2022Article
- Diagnostic performance of FJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Recommendations forJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Review
- How do we establish cardiac sympathetic nervous system imaging withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Radiopharmaceutical tracers for cardiac imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Improving the worldwide quality of nuclear cardiology practice and research: The role of the official journal.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- Comparisons and contrasts in the practice of nuclear cardiology in the United States and Japan.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear cardiology imaging tests are widely performed in Japan as clinical practice. The Japanese nuclear cardiology community has developed new diagnostic imaging tests using (123)I-beta-methyl-p-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid, (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine, and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for detecting cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis. These tests have become popular worldwide. The Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology have published clinical imaging guidelines showing indications and standards for the new imaging tests. JSNC is currently striving to improve the standard of clinical practice and is promoting research activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.