ReviewThe application of clinical genetics2015
Emerging pharmacologic treatment options for fragile X syndrome.
Review in The application of clinical genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular biomarkers predictive of sertraline treatment response in young children with fragile X syndrome.Brain & development · 2017Trial
- Navigating the Complex Landscape of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Challenges and Opportunities in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Supports.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Partners in plasticity: serotonergic glial interactions in brain circuit remodeling.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Contribution of FMRP to the Development of Speech and Vocabulary in Young Boys with Fragile X Syndrome: A Retrospective Examination.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Brain Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Fragile X Syndrome as an interneuronopathy: a lesson for future studies and treatments.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- The feasibility and utility of hair follicle sampling to measure FMRP and FMR1 mRNA in children with or without fragile X syndrome: a pilot study.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Article
- Ythdf is a N6-methyladenosine reader that modulates Fmr1 target mRNA selection and restricts axonal growth in Drosophila.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- The Use of Peptides in the Treatment of Fragile X Syndrome: Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity in Fragile X Syndrome Highlights the Need for Precision Medicine-Based Treatments.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Modeling Fragile X Syndrome inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Review
- Parental Perspectives on Pharmacological Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Study in Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Inhibition of group-I metabotropic glutamate receptors protects against prion toxicity.PLoS pathogens · 2017Article
- Insulin signaling misregulation underlies circadian and cognitive deficits in a Drosophila fragile X model.Molecular psychiatry · 2017Article
- Deficits in the activity of presynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors contribute to altered neuronal excitability in fragile X syndrome.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Delineating the Common Biological Pathways Perturbed by ASD's Genetic Etiology: Lessons from Network-Based Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Fragile X targeted pharmacotherapy: lessons learned and future directions.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Review
- Acamprosate in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome: modulation of spontaneous cortical activity, ERK1/2 activation, locomotor behavior, and anxiety.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Article
- Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Review
- FMRP Expression Levels in Mouse Central Nervous System Neurons Determine Behavioral Phenotype.Human gene therapy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common single gene cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Caused by a silenced fragile X mental retardation 1 gene and the subsequent deficiency in fragile X mental retardation protein, patients with FXS experience a range of physical, behavioral, and intellectual debilitations. The FXS field, as a whole, has recently met with some challenges, as several targeted clinical trials with high expectations of success have failed to elucidate significant improvements in a variety of symptom domains. As new clinical trials in FXS are planned, there has been much discussion about the use of the commonly used clinical outcome measures, as well as study design considerations, patient stratification, and optimal age range for treatment. The evidence that modification of these drug targets and use of these failed compounds would prove to be efficacious in human clinical study were rooted in years of basic and translational research. There are questions arising as to the use of the mouse models for studying FXS treatment development. This issue is twofold: many of the symptom domains and molecular and biochemical changes assessed and indicative of efficacy in mouse model study are not easily amenable to clinical trials in people with FXS because of the intolerability of the testing paradigm or a lack of noninvasive techniques (prepulse inhibition, sensory hypersensitivity, startle reactivity, or electrophysiologic, biochemical, or structural changes in the brain); and capturing subtle yet meaningful changes in symptom domains such as sociability, anxiety, and hyperactivity in human FXS clinical trials is challenging with the currently used measures (typically parent/caregiver rating scales). Clinicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry have all had to take a step back and critically evaluate the way we think about how to best optimize future investigations into pharmacologic FXS treatments. As new clinical trials are coming down the drug discovery pipeline, it is clear that the field is moving in a direction that values the development of molecular biomarkers, less subjective quantitative measures of symptom improvement, and rating scales developed specifically for use in FXS in conjunction with drug safety. While summarizing preclinical evidence, where applicable, and discussing challenges in FXS treatment development, this review details both completed clinical trials for the targeted and symptomatic treatment of FXS and introduces novel projects on the cusp of clinical trial investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.