Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909465›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The effect of an information and communication technology (ICT) on older adults' quality of life: study protocol for a randomized control trial.

David H Gustafson, Fiona McTavish, David H Gustafson, Jane E Mahoney, Roberta A Johnson, John D Lee, Andrew Quanbeck, Amy K Atwood, Andrew Isham, Raj Veeramani and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02128789 (Bring Communities and Technology Together for Healthy Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02128789 nacompletednot on this map

Bring Communities and Technology Together for Healthy Aging

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2011 to 2016Enrolled600Conditions65 Years Older, Requires IADL Support, Past Year History of Falls and/or HospitalizationArmsElder Tree website
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Virtual Home Assistant Use and Perceptions of Usefulness by Older Adults and Support Person Dyads.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Technology Acceptance and Quality of Life among Older People Using a TUI Application.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David H GustafsonCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. dhgustaf@wisc.edu.
Fiona McTavishCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. fmmctavi@wisc.edu.
David H GustafsonCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. dgustafson@wisc.edu.
Jane E MahoneyDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and Executive Director, Wisconsin Institute for Health Aging, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. jm2@medicine.wisc.edu.
Roberta A JohnsonCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. rjohnson24@wisc.edu.
John D LeeDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. jdlee@engr.wisc.edu.
Andrew QuanbeckCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. arquanbe@wisc.edu.
Amy K AtwoodCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. aatwood@wisc.edu.
Andrew IshamCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. ajisham@wisc.edu.
Raj VeeramaniCollege of Engineering and School of Business and Executive Director, University of Wisconsin E-Business Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. raj.veeramani@uwebc.wisc.edu.
Lindy ClemsonAging, Work & Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. lindy.clemson@sydney.ed.au.
Dhavan ShahMass Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. dshah@wisc.edu.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Bringing Communities and Technology Together for Healthy AgingP50HS019917 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2011 to 2015
$9.5M
Impact on opioid use of bundling medication-assisted treatment with mHealthR01DA040449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Conceptualizing the problem of implementation: a systems engineering perspective applied in substance abuse treatmentK01DA039336 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$741k
Physician coaching to reduce opioid-related harmsR34DA036720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BROWN, RANDALL T, QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2014 to 2016
$683k
AHRQ HHS 5P50HS019917-04AHRQ HHS P50 HS019917NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039336NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040449NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA036720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the use of an information and communication technology (Elder Tree) designed for older adults and their informal caregivers to improve older adult quality of life and address challenges older adults face in maintaining their independence (for example, loneliness and isolation, falling, managing medications, driving and transportation). METHODS/

designThis study, an unblinded randomized controlled trial, will evaluate the effectiveness and cost of Elder Tree. Older adults who are at risk for losing their independence - along with their informal caregivers, if they name them - are randomized to two groups. The intervention group has access to their usual sources of information and communication as well as to Elder Tree for 18 months while the control group uses only their usual sources of information and communication. The primary outcome of the study is older adult quality of life. Secondary outcomes are cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year and the impact of the technology on independence, loneliness, falls, medication management, driving and transportation, and caregiver appraisal and mastery. We will also examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory. We will evaluate the effectiveness of Elder Tree by comparing intervention- and control-group participants at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18. We will use mixed-effect models to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes, where pretest score functions as a covariate, treatment condition is a between-subjects factor, and the multivariate outcome reflects scores for a given assessment at the three time points. Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome. Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Additional analyses will examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory on each outcome. DISCUSSION: Elder Tree is a multifaceted intervention, making it a challenge to assess which services or combinations of services account for outcomes in which subsets of older adults. If Elder Tree can improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs among older adults, it could suggest a promising way to ease the burden that advancing age can place on older adults, their families, and the healthcare system.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02128789 . Registered on 26 March 2014.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersConsumer Health InformationHealth Information SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services for the AgedMedical InformaticsQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAge FactorsAgingCaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisEmotionsFemaleGeriatric Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25909465
PMCPMC4417513

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.